Ute Kreplin

447 total citations
9 papers, 292 citations indexed

About

Ute Kreplin is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Sensory Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Ute Kreplin has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 292 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 4 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 4 papers in Sensory Systems. Recurrent topics in Ute Kreplin's work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (4 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (3 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers). Ute Kreplin is often cited by papers focused on Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (4 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (3 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers). Ute Kreplin collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Netherlands. Ute Kreplin's co-authors include Miguel Farias, Inti A. Brazil, Stephen Fairclough, Christopher Burns, Elke Geraerts, Guy Kahane, Anna Joyce, Lluís Oviedo, Julian Savulescu and Barbara Dritschel and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Neuropsychologia and Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Ute Kreplin

9 papers receiving 283 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ute Kreplin United Kingdom	8	116	102	92	62	44	9	292
Mingyue Xiao China	13	166 1.4×	134 1.3×	119 1.3×	122 2.0×	16 0.4×	46	374
Monica E Ellwood-Lowe United States	8	86 0.7×	94 0.9×	35 0.4×	58 0.9×	18 0.4×	14	247
Tiago Bortolini Brazil	9	116 1.0×	121 1.2×	126 1.4×	59 1.0×	17 0.4×	18	364
Kim Taylor‐Thompson United States	6	112 1.0×	117 1.1×	51 0.6×	62 1.0×	10 0.2×	15	279
Xi Tong China	6	220 1.9×	65 0.6×	56 0.6×	119 1.9×	14 0.3×	7	358
Yung‐Jong Shiah Taiwan	11	106 0.9×	51 0.5×	129 1.4×	42 0.7×	4 0.1×	32	313
Katherine E. Powers United States	11	85 0.7×	178 1.7×	180 2.0×	104 1.7×	7 0.2×	17	373
Ignacio Lucas Spain	11	171 1.5×	45 0.4×	37 0.4×	74 1.2×	8 0.2×	44	400
Edith M. Rickett United States	5	53 0.5×	85 0.8×	93 1.0×	55 0.9×	4 0.1×	5	310
Liza J. M. Cornet Netherlands	10	132 1.1×	70 0.7×	86 0.9×	44 0.7×	3 0.1×	16	301

Countries citing papers authored by Ute Kreplin

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ute Kreplin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ute Kreplin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ute Kreplin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ute Kreplin

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ute Kreplin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ute Kreplin. The network helps show where Ute Kreplin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ute Kreplin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ute Kreplin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ute Kreplin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ute Kreplin. Ute Kreplin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Kreplin, Ute, et al.. (2022). Mindfulness or expectancy? The label of mindfulness leads to expectancy effects. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research. 23(1). 49–63. 5 indexed citations

Kreplin, Ute, Miguel Farias, & Inti A. Brazil. (2018). The limited prosocial effects of meditation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports. 8(1). 2403–2403. 135 indexed citations

Fairclough, Stephen, Christopher Burns, & Ute Kreplin. (2018). FNIRS activity in the prefrontal cortex and motivational intensity: impact of working memory load, financial reward, and correlation-based signal improvement. Neurophotonics. 5(3). 1–1. 26 indexed citations

Huang, Yuxia, Zhang Zong, Hui Zhou, et al.. (2017). Test–retest reliability of the prefrontal response to affective pictures based on functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 22(1). 16011–16011. 16 indexed citations

Farias, Miguel, Valerie van Mulukom, Guy Kahane, et al.. (2017). Supernatural Belief Is Not Modulated by Intuitive Thinking Style or Cognitive Inhibition. Scientific Reports. 7(1). 15100–15100. 30 indexed citations

Kreplin, Ute & Stephen Fairclough. (2015). Effects of self-directed and other-directed introspection and emotional valence on activation of the rostral prefrontal cortex during aesthetic experience. Neuropsychologia. 71. 38–45. 16 indexed citations

Kreplin, Ute, Volker Thoma, & Paul Rodway. (2014). Looking behaviour and preference for artworks: The role of emotional valence and location. Acta Psychologica. 152. 100–108. 8 indexed citations

Kreplin, Ute & Stephen Fairclough. (2013). Activation of the rostromedial prefrontal cortex during the experience of positive emotion in the context of esthetic experience. An fNIRS study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 7. 41 indexed citations

Geraerts, Elke, et al.. (2011). Reduced specificity of negative autobiographical memories in repressive coping. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 43. S32–S36. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact