Ute Kreplin

447 citations
9 papers · 292 indexed · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Ute Kreplin

9 papers receiving 283 citations

Peers

Ute Kreplin
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Clinical Psychology 116
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 102
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 62
  • Health 39
  • Social Psychology 92
Replace Mingyue Xiao with:
Mingyue Xiao China
Alexander C. Wilson United Kingdom
Kuan‐Hua Chen United States
Daniel T. Burley United Kingdom
Wai‐Cheong Carl Tam Taiwan
Yung‐Jong Shiah Taiwan
Kim Taylor‐Thompson United States
Cornelia Pocnet Switzerland
Tiago Bortolini Brazil
Sarah A. Landsberger United States
Ute Kreplin relative to Mingyue Xiao China Mingyue Xiao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16×
Mingyue Xiao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ute Kreplin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ute Kreplin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ute Kreplin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ute Kreplin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ute Kreplin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ute Kreplin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ute Kreplin. The network helps show where Ute Kreplin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Ute Kreplin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ute Kreplin Line = papers co-authored together Ute Kreplin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2018135
2 201341
3 201730
4 201826
5 201716
6 201516
7 201115
8 20148
9 20225

About Ute Kreplin

Ute Kreplin is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Clinical Psychology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 292 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (4 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (3 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (2 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (2 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers) and Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (116 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (102 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (62 citations), Health (39 citations) and Social Psychology (92 citations). Ute Kreplin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Miguel Farias, Inti A. Brazil, Stephen Fairclough, Christopher Burns, Lluís Oviedo, Barbara Dritschel, Valerie van Mulukom, Elke Geraerts, Riikka Möttönen and Volker Thoma. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Journal of Biomedical Optics, Neurophotonics, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience and Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact