Uma Shastri

1.0k total citations
10 papers, 533 citations indexed

About

Uma Shastri is a scholar working on Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Uma Shastri has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 533 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Surgery, 3 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and 2 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Uma Shastri's work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (7 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (5 papers) and Shoulder Injury and Treatment (3 papers). Uma Shastri is often cited by papers focused on Anesthesia and Pain Management (7 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (5 papers) and Shoulder Injury and Treatment (3 papers). Uma Shastri collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Belgium. Uma Shastri's co-authors include Kwesi Kwofie, Daquan Xu, Emine Aysu Şalvız, Colin J. L. McCartney, Jeff Gadsden, Jonathan H. Abrams, Sanjay Sinha, Ali Shariat, Admir Hadžić and Richard Holtby and has published in prestigious journals such as Pain, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery and Anesthesia & Analgesia.

In The Last Decade

Uma Shastri

10 papers receiving 510 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Uma Shastri Canada 6 524 130 85 80 45 10 533
Kwesi Kwofie Canada 8 453 0.9× 110 0.8× 65 0.8× 85 1.1× 33 0.7× 24 470
Daniel Maalouf United States 11 605 1.2× 118 0.9× 108 1.3× 64 0.8× 27 0.6× 16 629
Catherine Vandepitte Belgium 10 484 0.9× 86 0.7× 154 1.8× 116 1.4× 35 0.8× 25 522
Emine Aysu Şalvız Türkiye 10 430 0.8× 87 0.7× 83 1.0× 59 0.7× 31 0.7× 29 474
Bahadır Çiftçi Türkiye 13 562 1.1× 186 1.4× 200 2.4× 96 1.2× 48 1.1× 71 588
Antonio Clemente Italy 9 448 0.9× 83 0.6× 102 1.2× 88 1.1× 15 0.3× 19 500
Steven H. Renes Netherlands 8 521 1.0× 136 1.0× 135 1.6× 78 1.0× 34 0.8× 9 556
Jonathan H. Abrams United States 7 428 0.8× 95 0.7× 62 0.7× 45 0.6× 30 0.7× 8 433
Robert B. Maniker United States 8 368 0.7× 50 0.4× 129 1.5× 68 0.8× 34 0.8× 16 419
Marina Yufa United States 6 522 1.0× 108 0.8× 118 1.4× 154 1.9× 27 0.6× 7 543

Countries citing papers authored by Uma Shastri

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Uma Shastri's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Uma Shastri with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Uma Shastri more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Uma Shastri

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Uma Shastri. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Uma Shastri. The network helps show where Uma Shastri may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Uma Shastri

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Uma Shastri. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Uma Shastri based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Uma Shastri. Uma Shastri is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Feng, Xiaoke, et al.. (2023). Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Liposomal to Plain Bupivacaine in the Transversus Abdominis Plane for DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 153(3). 543–551. 4 indexed citations
2.
3.
Şalvız, Emine Aysu, Daquan Xu, Ashton Frulla, et al.. (2013). Continuous Interscalene Block in Patients Having Outpatient Rotator Cuff Repair Surgery. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 117(6). 1485–1492. 97 indexed citations
4.
Kwofie, Kwesi, Uma Shastri, Jeff Gadsden, et al.. (2013). The Effects of Ultrasound-Guided Adductor Canal Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block on Quadriceps Strength and Fall Risk. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. 38(4). 321–325. 171 indexed citations
5.
Kwofie, Kwesi, Uma Shastri, & Catherine Vandepitte. (2013). Standard approaches for upper extremity nerve blocks with an emphasis on outpatient surgery. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 26(4). 501–508. 3 indexed citations
6.
Shariat, Ali, Admir Hadžić, Daquan Xu, et al.. (2013). Fascia lliaca Block for Analgesia After Hip Arthroplasty. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. 38(3). 201–205. 66 indexed citations
7.
Kwofie, Kwesi, Uma Shastri, Jeff Gadsden, et al.. (2013). The Effects of Ultrasound-Guided Adductor Canal Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block on Quadriceps Strength and Fall Risk. 2 indexed citations
8.
McCartney, Colin J. L., et al.. (2010). Evidence Basis for the Use of Ultrasound for Upper-Extremity Blocks. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. 35(Suppl 1). S10–S15. 47 indexed citations
9.
McNaught, Andrew, Uma Shastri, Nicole Carmichael, et al.. (2010). Ultrasound reduces the minimum effective local anaesthetic volume compared with peripheral nerve stimulation for interscalene block. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 106(1). 124–130. 103 indexed citations
10.
Shastri, Uma, Peter Slinger, Elsie T. Nguyen, José C. A. Carvalho, & Mrinalini Balki. (2010). Pulmonary edema during cesarean delivery in a patient with a mediastinal mass. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie. 58(3). 285–289. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026