Andrew McNaught

4.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
67 papers, 2.8k citations indexed

About

Andrew McNaught is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew McNaught has authored 67 papers receiving a total of 2.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 49 papers in Ophthalmology, 39 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 7 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Andrew McNaught's work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (40 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (19 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (16 papers). Andrew McNaught is often cited by papers focused on Glaucoma and retinal disorders (40 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (19 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (16 papers). Andrew McNaught collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Andrew McNaught's co-authors include David P. Crabb, Roger A. Hitchings, Marcus Ennis, Kirill Degtyarenko, Paula de Matos, Rafael Alcántara, Magali Zbinden, Mickaël Guedj, Michael Ashburner and Janna Hastings and has published in prestigious journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, Journal of Clinical Oncology and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Andrew McNaught

63 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Hit Papers

ChEBI: a database and ontology for chemical entities of b... 2007 2026 2013 2019 2007 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew McNaught United Kingdom 26 1.5k 1.2k 777 263 224 67 2.8k
Valentina L. Kouznetsova United States 21 1.3k 0.9× 1.9k 1.6× 529 0.7× 69 0.3× 155 0.7× 84 3.1k
Elvira Agrón United States 35 2.9k 1.9× 2.1k 1.7× 862 1.1× 94 0.4× 40 0.2× 109 3.9k
Roy C. Milton United States 28 1.4k 0.9× 931 0.8× 600 0.8× 89 0.3× 60 0.3× 48 2.7k
Marlos A. G. Viana United States 26 540 0.4× 354 0.3× 285 0.4× 141 0.5× 31 0.1× 73 2.1k
Dexter Hadley United States 21 100 0.1× 278 0.2× 1.2k 1.5× 114 0.4× 292 1.3× 56 2.8k
Liu Li China 18 281 0.2× 456 0.4× 239 0.3× 47 0.2× 157 0.7× 174 1.3k
László Kovács Hungary 26 102 0.1× 181 0.2× 879 1.1× 94 0.4× 224 1.0× 135 2.4k
Zhen Ling Teo Singapore 14 1.1k 0.7× 921 0.8× 244 0.3× 47 0.2× 105 0.5× 40 1.7k
Miao Li Chee Singapore 17 1.6k 1.1× 1.3k 1.1× 361 0.5× 59 0.2× 18 0.1× 39 2.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew McNaught

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew McNaught's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew McNaught with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew McNaught more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew McNaught

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew McNaught. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew McNaught. The network helps show where Andrew McNaught may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew McNaught

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew McNaught. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew McNaught based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew McNaught. Andrew McNaught is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fu, Dun Jack, et al.. (2024). Survival of medical treatment success in primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 108(12). 1701–1707. 4 indexed citations
2.
Fu, Dun Jack, et al.. (2022). Burden of Glaucoma in the United Kingdom. Ophthalmology Glaucoma. 6(1). 106–115. 19 indexed citations
3.
Rabiolo, Alessandro, Eugenio Alladio, Esteban Morales, et al.. (2021). Forecasting the COVID-19 Epidemic By Integrating Symptom Search Behavior Into Predictive Models: Infoveillance Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 23(8). e28876–e28876. 18 indexed citations
4.
Khawaja, Anthony P., et al.. (2019). Real-World Outcomes of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty in the United Kingdom. Ophthalmology. 127(6). 748–757. 56 indexed citations
5.
McNaught, Andrew & David P. Crabb. (2018). Ten year, single surgeon, series of 'Moorfields safer surgery technique' trabeculectomy, and combined phacotrabeculectomy with IOL: a 'Medisoft' EPR audit from Gloucestershire, UK. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 59(9). 466–466. 1 indexed citations
6.
Kirwan, James, Alastair Lockwood, Peter Shah, et al.. (2013). Trabeculectomy in the 21st Century. Ophthalmology. 120(12). 2532–2539. 211 indexed citations
7.
Abdallah, Faraj W., Pamela J. Morgan, Tulin Cil, et al.. (2013). Ultrasound-guided Multilevel Paravertebral Blocks and Total Intravenous Anesthesia Improve the Quality of Recovery after Ambulatory Breast Tumor Resection. Anesthesiology. 120(3). 703–713. 121 indexed citations
8.
McNaught, Andrew, et al.. (2011). A hybrid tool for reaching and grasping rehabilitation: The ArmeoFES. PubMed. 2011. 3047–3050. 3 indexed citations
9.
Mordant, D. J., Gonzalo Muyo, Alistair Gorman, et al.. (2011). Spectral imaging of the retina. Eye. 25(3). 309–320. 94 indexed citations
10.
Mordant, D. J., et al.. (2009). Retinal Vessel Oxygen Saturation Measurements in Asymmetrical Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Using Hyperspectral Imaging. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 50(13). 5803–5803. 2 indexed citations
11.
McNaught, Andrew, et al.. (2008). Development of a Model Eye to Validate Oximetric Measurements in the Human Retinal Vasculature Using Hyperspectral Imaging. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 49(13). 921–921. 1 indexed citations
12.
Stumpf, Thomas, Michael W. Austin, Philip Bloom, Andrew McNaught, & James P. Morgan. (2008). Transscleral Cyclodiode Laser Photocoagulation in the Treatment of Aqueous Misdirection Syndrome. Ophthalmology. 115(11). 2058–2061. 36 indexed citations
13.
Mordant, D. J., et al.. (2007). Hyperspectral Imaging of the Human Retina - Oximetric Studies. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 48(13). 148–148. 1 indexed citations
14.
McNaught, Andrew, et al.. (2007). Quantitative Spectral Imaging of the Retina. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 48(13). 2581–2581. 3 indexed citations
15.
Muyo, Gonzalo, et al.. (2007). En Face Snapshot Spectral Imaging of the Retina. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 48(13). 2582–2582. 1 indexed citations
17.
Craig, Jamie E., et al.. (2000). Familial aggregation of glaucoma: Experience with the glaucoma inheritance study in Tasmania (GIST). eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 41. 1 indexed citations
18.
McNaught, Andrew, Roger A. Hitchings, David P. Crabb, & Fred W. Fitzke. (1995). Modelling series of visual fields to detect progression in normal-tension glaucoma. Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 233(12). 750–755. 88 indexed citations
19.
Fitzke, Fred W. & Andrew McNaught. (1994). The diagnosis of visual field progression in glaucoma. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. 5(2). 110–115. 20 indexed citations
20.
Chumas, Paul, et al.. (1991). Cervical arterial dissection following trauma. British Journal of Neurosurgery. 5(3). 313–316. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026