Emily Lin

584 total citations
9 papers, 362 citations indexed

About

Emily Lin is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Lin has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 362 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Surgery, 2 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 2 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. Recurrent topics in Emily Lin's work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (7 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (4 papers) and Nausea and vomiting management (3 papers). Emily Lin is often cited by papers focused on Anesthesia and Pain Management (7 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (4 papers) and Nausea and vomiting management (3 papers). Emily Lin collaborates with scholars based in United States, Guatemala and Italy. Emily Lin's co-authors include Murray F. Brennan, Leslie H. Blumgart, Yuman Fong, Joseph G. Fortner, Jeff Gadsden, Admir Hadžić, Uma Shastri, Emine Aysu Şalvız, Ali Shariat and Junping Chen and has published in prestigious journals such as Anesthesiology, British journal of surgery and Anesthesia & Analgesia.

In The Last Decade

Emily Lin

8 papers receiving 350 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Emily Lin United States	6	347	87	83	65	35	9	362
Waldemar Trolle Denmark	9	219 0.6×	43 0.5×	89 1.1×	13 0.2×	50 1.4×	16	301
Roger Wale Australia	12	213 0.6×	164 1.9×	77 0.9×	29 0.4×	30 0.9×	22	320
Toshimasa Ishii Japan	11	214 0.6×	207 2.4×	84 1.0×	39 0.6×	11 0.3×	44	319
Joseph Whiteley United States	7	177 0.5×	47 0.5×	41 0.5×	71 1.1×	29 0.8×	12	273
Kris Vermeylen Belgium	9	374 1.1×	21 0.2×	49 0.6×	87 1.3×	71 2.0×	22	440
Berker Özkan Türkiye	9	134 0.4×	36 0.4×	107 1.3×	32 0.5×	64 1.8×	33	278
Yaseen Alastal United States	10	364 1.0×	208 2.4×	250 3.0×	40 0.6×	8 0.2×	59	459
Salvatore Lo Bianco Italy	10	140 0.4×	33 0.4×	19 0.2×	11 0.2×	44 1.3×	25	242
G. Bruch United Kingdom	6	430 1.2×	78 0.9×	72 0.9×	18 0.3×	131 3.7×	7	489
Ajmer Singh India	10	176 0.5×	37 0.4×	58 0.7×	12 0.2×	25 0.7×	38	306

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Lin

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Lin

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Lin. The network helps show where Emily Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Lin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Lin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Lin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Lin. Emily Lin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Assel, Melissa, Emily Lin, Tracy‐Ann Moo, et al.. (2024). Optimizing accrual to a large-scale, clinically integrated randomized trial in anesthesiology: A 2-year analysis of recruitment. Clinical Trials. 22(1). 57–65.

2.

Ayyala, Haripriya S., Melissa Assel, Kay See Tan, et al.. (2024). Paravertebral and erector spinae plane blocks decrease length of stay compared with local infiltration analgesia in autologous breast reconstruction. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. 50(4). 339–344. 3 indexed citations

3.

Assel, Melissa, Brett A. Simon, Emily Lin, et al.. (2023). Regional Blocks Benefit Patients Undergoing Bilateral Mastectomy with Immediate Implant-Based Reconstruction, Even After Discharge. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 31(1). 316–324. 1 indexed citations

4.

Gadsden, Jeff, et al.. (2014). Opening Injection Pressure Consistently Detects Needle–Nerve Contact during Ultrasound-guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block. Anesthesiology. 120(5). 1246–1253. 64 indexed citations

5.

Goon, Amanda K., David M. Dines, Edward V. Craig, et al.. (2014). A Clinical Pathway for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty—A Pilot Study. HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery. 10(2). 100–106. 19 indexed citations

6.

Şalvız, Emine Aysu, Daquan Xu, Ashton Frulla, et al.. (2013). Continuous Interscalene Block in Patients Having Outpatient Rotator Cuff Repair Surgery. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 117(6). 1485–1492. 97 indexed citations

7.

Lin, Emily, et al.. (2013). Peripheral nerve blocks for outpatient surgery. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 26(4). 467–474. 21 indexed citations

8.

Lin, Emily, et al.. (2013). Regional anesthesia for trauma outside the operating theatre. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 26(4). 495–500. 28 indexed citations

9.

Fong, Yuman, Leslie H. Blumgart, Emily Lin, Joseph G. Fortner, & Murray F. Brennan. (1996). Outcome of treatment for distal bile duct cancer. British journal of surgery. 83(12). 1712–1715. 129 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact