Tyler Mark

999 total citations
50 papers, 645 citations indexed

About

Tyler Mark is a scholar working on Plant Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Tyler Mark has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 645 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Plant Science, 15 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and 13 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Tyler Mark's work include Organic Food and Agriculture (10 papers), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (9 papers) and Agricultural Innovations and Practices (6 papers). Tyler Mark is often cited by papers focused on Organic Food and Agriculture (10 papers), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (9 papers) and Agricultural Innovations and Practices (6 papers). Tyler Mark collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea. Tyler Mark's co-authors include Michael R. Reed, Yuqing Zheng, Jayson L. Lusk, Joshua D. Detre, Ashok K. Mishra, Michael D. Montross, Aaron P. Turner, Joshua J. Jackson, K.A. Dolecheck and J.M. Bewley and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Dairy Science and Sustainability.

In The Last Decade

Tyler Mark

43 papers receiving 602 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tyler Mark United States 13 232 146 119 98 74 50 645
Biao Zhang China 16 223 1.0× 157 1.1× 75 0.6× 81 0.8× 22 0.3× 49 919
Catherine Chan‐Halbrendt United States 11 130 0.6× 45 0.3× 91 0.8× 26 0.3× 86 1.2× 31 447
George Vlontzos Greece 16 178 0.8× 58 0.4× 269 2.3× 68 0.7× 18 0.2× 56 832
Bart Gremmen Netherlands 17 180 0.8× 51 0.3× 38 0.3× 56 0.6× 18 0.2× 56 902
Mike Berners-Lee United Kingdom 11 129 0.6× 74 0.5× 141 1.2× 29 0.3× 35 0.5× 13 1.2k
Zhigang Wang China 16 275 1.2× 89 0.6× 200 1.7× 103 1.1× 14 0.2× 75 1.1k
Sven Anders Canada 20 278 1.2× 268 1.8× 294 2.5× 105 1.1× 10 0.1× 70 1.3k
Vesna Rodić Serbia 12 99 0.4× 38 0.3× 39 0.3× 101 1.0× 27 0.4× 53 502
Rainer Haas Austria 15 315 1.4× 208 1.4× 114 1.0× 41 0.4× 23 0.3× 76 865
Junpeng Li China 19 545 2.3× 16 0.1× 136 1.1× 156 1.6× 23 0.3× 60 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Tyler Mark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tyler Mark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tyler Mark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tyler Mark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tyler Mark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tyler Mark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tyler Mark. The network helps show where Tyler Mark may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tyler Mark

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tyler Mark. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tyler Mark based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tyler Mark. Tyler Mark is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Buzas, Jeffrey S., et al.. (2024). Determinants of behavior towards hemp-based products: an application of the theory of planned behavior. British Food Journal. 126(13). 394–414. 2 indexed citations
2.
Popp, Michael P., et al.. (2024). CBD Oil Concentration and Hemp Flower Drying Preferences of U.S. Consumers. 5(1). 82–95.
3.
Jablonski, Becca B.R., et al.. (2023). Producers marketing a novel crop: a field-level view of hemp market channels. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. 38. 2 indexed citations
4.
Kolodinsky, Jane, et al.. (2023). The reintroduction of hemp in the USA: a content analysis of state and tribal hemp production plans. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(1). 17–17. 4 indexed citations
5.
Mark, Tyler, et al.. (2023). What factors make consumers in the USA buy hemp products? Evidence from Nielsen consumer panel data. Agricultural and Food Economics. 11(1). 5 indexed citations
6.
Mark, Tyler, et al.. (2018). Functions of Wheat Supply and Demand in Saudi Arabia. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
7.
Dolecheck, K.A., M.W. Overton, Tyler Mark, & J.M. Bewley. (2018). Use of a stochastic simulation model to estimate the cost per case of digital dermatitis, sole ulcer, and white line disease by parity group and incidence timing. Journal of Dairy Science. 102(1). 715–730. 33 indexed citations
8.
Mark, Tyler, et al.. (2018). Using Simulated Farm Case Studies to Teach Financial and Risk Management Concepts. Journal of Extension. 56(1). 1 indexed citations
9.
Mark, Tyler, et al.. (2018). New Market Opportunities and Consumer Heterogeneity in the U.S. Organic Food Market. Sustainability. 10(9). 3166–3166. 12 indexed citations
10.
Dolecheck, K.A., M.W. Overton, Tyler Mark, & J.M. Bewley. (2018). Estimating the value of infectious or noninfectious foot disorder prevention strategies within dairy farms, as influenced by foot disorder incidence rates and prevention effectiveness. Journal of Dairy Science. 102(1). 731–741. 3 indexed citations
11.
Mark, Tyler, et al.. (2018). The Price Relationship between Organic and Non-Organic Vegetables in the U.S.: Evidence from Nielsen Scanner Data. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
12.
Mark, Tyler & Terry Griffin. (2016). Defining the Barriers to Telematics for Precision Agriculture: Connectivity Supply and Demand. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 1 indexed citations
13.
Griffin, Terry, et al.. (2016). Big Data Considerations for Rural Property Professionals. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 2015. 167–180. 12 indexed citations
14.
Mark, Tyler, et al.. (2016). The Role of Wireless Broadband Connectivity on ‘Big Data’ and the Agricultural Industry in the United States and Australia. The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review. 19. 43–56. 15 indexed citations
15.
Mark, Tyler, Brian E. Whitacre, & Terry Griffin. (2015). Assessing the Value of Broadband Connectivity for Big Data and Telematics: Technical Efficiency. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 2 indexed citations
16.
Salassi, Michael E., et al.. (2015). Economic Potential for Energy Cane Production as a Cellulosic Biofuel Feedstock in the Southeastern United States. AIMS energy. 3(1). 25–40. 1 indexed citations
17.
Mark, Tyler, et al.. (2015). Will the New Dairy Margin Protection Program Reduce Risk for Dairies?. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 1 indexed citations
18.
Gillespie, Jeffrey, et al.. (2009). Computerized Technology Adoption Among Farms in the U.S. Dairy Industry. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 2009. 201–209. 6 indexed citations
19.
Lusk, Jayson L., et al.. (2006). Consumer Behavior, Public Policy, and Country-of-Origin Labeling. Review of Agricultural Economics. 28(2). 284–292. 115 indexed citations
20.
Boehlje, Michael, et al.. (2006). THE GROWTH POTENTIAL FOR THE INDIANA LIVESTOCK INDUSTRIES. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026