Michael J. Baum

10.8k citations
219 papers · 9.9k · h-index 58

Impact in

Papers in

Michael J. Baum

219 papers receiving 9.5k citations

Peers

Michael J. Baum
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Sensory Systems 2.0k
  • Reproductive Medicine 586
  • Developmental Neuroscience 143
  • Social Psychology 666
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 163
Replace Julie Bakker with:
Julie Bakker Belgium
Sonoko Ogawa United States
Paul E. Micevych United States
Benjamin D. Sachs United States
Yasuo Sakuma Japan
Emilie F. Rissman United States
Sarah Winans Newman United States
Roger A. Gorski United States
Robert L. Moss United States
Raúl G. Paredes Guerrero Mexico
Michael J. Baum relative to Julie Bakker Belgium Julie Bakker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
Julie Bakker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Baum. The network helps show where Michael J. Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael J. Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael J. Baum Line = papers co-authored together Michael J. Baum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 219 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992306
2 1979302
3 1973260
4 2008242
5 2009183
6 2000181
7 2004178
8 2007155
9 1999145
10 2009142
11 1996141
12 2006126
13 1995124
14 1993118
15 2006115
16 2002114
17 1986109
18 2008106
19 2002105
20 1982103

About Michael J. Baum

Michael J. Baum is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Reproductive Medicine, Molecular Biology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Social Psychology, having authored 219 papers that have together received 9.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (62 papers), Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (49 papers), Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (21 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (6 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (3 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (3 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers) and Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (2.0k citations), Reproductive Medicine (586 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (143 citations), Social Psychology (666 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (163 citations). Michael J. Baum has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include James A. Cherry, Julie Bakker, Stuart A. Tobet, J. T. M. Vreeburg, Mary S. Erskine, Barry J. Everitt, Raúl G. Paredes Guerrero, Kevin R. Kelliher, Scott R. Wersinger and Matthieu Keller. Their work appears in journals such as Hormones and Behavior, Physiology & Behavior, Endocrinology, Biology of Reproduction and Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact