Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A cross-language study of prosodic modifications in mothers' and fathers' speech to preverbal infants
1989590 citationsAnne Fernald, Traute Taeschner et al.Journal of Child Languageprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Traute Taeschner
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Traute Taeschner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Traute Taeschner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Traute Taeschner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Traute Taeschner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Traute Taeschner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Traute Taeschner. The network helps show where Traute Taeschner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Traute Taeschner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Traute Taeschner.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Traute Taeschner based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Traute Taeschner. Traute Taeschner is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Taeschner, Traute, et al.. (2013). 'The Narrative Format' for Learning and Teaching Languages to Children and Adults. 223–235.2 indexed citations
6.
Candelier, Michel, et al.. (1998). Les langues vivantes dès l'école primaire ou maternelle : Conditions et résultats. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).2 indexed citations
7.
Candelier, Michel, et al.. (1998). Foreign languages in primary and pre-school education : a review of recent research within the European Union. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).38 indexed citations
8.
Candelier, Michel, et al.. (1997). Foreign Languages in Primary and Pre-School Education: Context and Outcomes. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).23 indexed citations
9.
Taeschner, Traute. (1993). Insegnare la lingua straniera con il format: un modello psicolinguistico per la scuola materna ed elementare. IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome).1 indexed citations
Taeschner, Traute, et al.. (1991). Risultati di una sperimentazione relativa all' insegnamento della lingua straniera a bambini. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas).1 indexed citations
12.
Fernald, Anne, et al.. (1989). A cross-language study of prosodic modifications in mothers' and fathers' speech to preverbal infants. Journal of Child Language. 16(3). 477–501.590 indexed citations breakdown →
Taeschner, Traute. (1983). Does the bilingual child possess twice the lexicon of the monolingual child. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 15(2). 179–188.5 indexed citations
Taeschner, Traute. (1976). Come definire la lingua dominante in un soggetto bilingue dallanascita. 8(2). 105–138.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.