This map shows the geographic impact of Toon Van Hal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Toon Van Hal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Toon Van Hal more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Toon Van Hal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Toon Van Hal. The network helps show where Toon Van Hal may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Toon Van Hal
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Toon Van Hal.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Toon Van Hal based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Toon Van Hal. Toon Van Hal is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hal, Toon Van. (2020). Between oblivion and instrumentalization. The vicissitudes of early-modern missionary grammars and dictionaries in 19th-century scholarship, and the special case of Julius Platzmann. Lirias (KU Leuven). 12(1). 65–82.
Swiggers, Pierre, et al.. (2018). The Leuven Collegium Trilingue 1517-1797: Erasmus, humanist educational practice and the new language institute Latin-Greek-Hebrew.
4.
Hal, Toon Van, et al.. (2017). Aspectual Choice in Greek Imperatives: A Corpus-Based Review of Existing Theories. Lirias (KU Leuven). 84(1). 19–51.4 indexed citations
5.
Hal, Toon Van. (2016). Bevoorrechte betrekkingen tussen het Grieks en het Germaans: Taalvergelijkende verkenningen in het Vroegduitse humanisme en in Wilhelm Otto Reitz' Belga graecissans (1730). Lirias (KU Leuven). 427–443.1 indexed citations
Hal, Toon Van. (2016). Bevoorrechte betrekkingen tussen Germaans en Grieks: Wilhelm Otto Reitz’ Belga graecissans (1730). 427–443.1 indexed citations
8.
Hal, Toon Van. (2015). Die Rolle des Altindischen bei der Gründung der Sprachwissenschaft als akademischer Disziplin. Revolution oder Kontinuation?. Lirias (KU Leuven).1 indexed citations
9.
Hal, Toon Van. (2014). Sprachen, die Geschichte schreiben. Zu Leibniz’ sprachhistorischem Forschungsprogramm und dessen Nachwirkung. Lirias (KU Leuven).2 indexed citations
Hal, Toon Van. (2011). When Quotation Marks Matter. Historiographia Linguistica. 38(1-2). 241–252.1 indexed citations
14.
Hal, Toon Van. (2010). “Quam enim periculosa sit ea via…”. Josephus Justus Scaliger’s views on linguistic kinship. Lirias (KU Leuven). 20(1). 111–140.1 indexed citations
15.
Hal, Toon Van. (2010). 'Moedertalen en taalmoeders'. Het vroegmoderne taalvergelijkende onderzoek in de Lage Landen. Lirias (KU Leuven).7 indexed citations
Hal, Toon Van. (2009). ‘Spreken als de vleermuizen’. Over de Griekse en Romeinse belangstelling voor andere talen — of het gebrek daaraan. Lirias (KU Leuven). 38(4). 146–162.2 indexed citations
Hal, Toon Van. (2008). Moedertalen en taalmoeders. Methodologie, epistemologie en ideologie van het taalvergelijkend onderzoek in de Renaissance, met bijzondere aandacht voor de bijdrage van de humanisten uit de Lage Landen.. Lirias (KU Leuven).4 indexed citations
20.
Hal, Toon Van. (2005). From Jones to Pictet. Some Notes on the Early History of Celtic Linguistics. Lirias (KU Leuven). 15(2). 219–244.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.