This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Depauw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Depauw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Depauw more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Depauw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Depauw. The network helps show where Mark Depauw may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Depauw
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Depauw.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Depauw based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Depauw. Mark Depauw is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Depauw, Mark. (2017). Roman Influence on Rituals of Identification in Egypt.
5.
Depauw, Mark, et al.. (2017). Horion & Co. Greek Hybrid Names and their Value for the Study of Intercultural Contacts in Graeco-Roman Egypt. Lirias (KU Leuven). 66(2). 193–215.1 indexed citations
Depauw, Mark, et al.. (2014). Linguistic Variation in Greek Papyri: Towards a New Tool for Quantitative Study. Greek, Roman and Byzantine studies. 55(1). 196–220.12 indexed citations
9.
Depauw, Mark, et al.. (2013). Quantifying Imprecisely Dated Sources. A New Inclusive Method for Charting Diachronic Change in Graeco-Roman Egypt. Ancient Society. 43(43). 101–114.5 indexed citations
10.
Depauw, Mark, et al.. (2010). καὶ ὡς χρηματίζει and the Importance of Naming in Roman Egypt. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik. 174. 159–166.1 indexed citations
11.
Depauw, Mark, et al.. (2009). People in Greek documentary papyri : first results of a research project / Mark Depauw, Bart van Beek.. 39. 31–47.4 indexed citations
12.
Bennett, Chris J. & Mark Depauw. (2007). The Reign of Berenike IV (Summer 58 – Spring 55 BC). Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik. 160. 211–214.1 indexed citations
13.
Depauw, Mark. (2006). Egyptianizing the Chancellery during the Great Theban Revolt (205-186 BC): a new study of limestone tablet Cairo 38258. Studien zur altägyptischen Kultur. 34(34). 97–105.3 indexed citations
14.
Depauw, Mark, et al.. (2004). Preliminary report of the 2002 campaign of the Belgian mission to Deir al-Barsha. Lirias (KU Leuven). 60. 237–283.8 indexed citations
15.
Depauw, Mark. (2003). Autograph confirmation in Demotic private contracts. Chronique d Egypte. 78. 66–111.2 indexed citations
16.
Depauw, Mark. (2003). Elkab and Edfu: a survey of local textual sources from the later periods. 29–43.
17.
Depauw, Mark. (2001). Recensie: Ägypten: Kultur und Lebenswelt in griechisch-römischer Zeit: eine Darstellung nach den demotischen Quellen / Hoffmann, F. (Berlin, 2000). 47. 275–277.2 indexed citations
18.
Depauw, Mark. (2000). Recensie: Fünf demotische Stelen aus Berlin, Chicago, Durham, London und Oxford mit zwei demotischen Türinschriften aus Paris und einer Bibliographie der demotischen Inschriften / Farid, A. (Berlin, 1995). 57.2 indexed citations
Depauw, Mark. (2000). The Archive of Teos and Thabis from Early Ptolemaic Thebes (P. Brux.Dem.Inv.E.8252-8256).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.