John Considine

1.4k citations
83 papers · 565 indexed · h-index 13

John Considine

71 papers receiving 458 citations

Peers

John Considine
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Biomaterials 171
  • History 88
  • Language and Linguistics 87
  • Classics 24
  • Anthropology 46
Replace F. E. Peters with:
F. E. Peters United States
Ruth MacKay United Kingdom
Alan S. C. Ross United Kingdom
Máxime Chevalier France
W. R. Johnson United States
Pierre Arnaud France
Emiliano Fernández de Pinedo y Fernández Spain
Douglas Cairns Russia
J. G. F. Powell United Kingdom
Luis de León Germany
John Considine relative to F. E. Peters United States F. E. Peters's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21.8×
F. E. Peters · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Considine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Considine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Considine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Considine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Considine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Considine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Considine. The network helps show where John Considine may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Considine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Considine Line = papers co-authored together John Considine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20242
2 20226
3 20212
4 20201
5 201921
6 201716
7 20151
8 20151
9 20141
10 20131
11
The ladies dictionary (1694)
20101
12 20092
13
Enhancing paper strength by optimizing defect configuration
20092
14 20069
15 200518
16 200524
17 20041
18
Dictionaries of Canadian English : lexicovaria
20032
19
The Lexicographer as Hero: Samuel Johnson and Henri Estienne
20002
20
The Meanings, deduced logically from the Etymology
19961

About John Considine

John Considine is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Anthropology, Biomaterials, History and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 83 papers that have together received 565 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lexicography and Language Studies (27 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (18 papers), Material Properties and Processing (15 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (14 papers), Advanced Cellulose Research Studies (14 papers), Wood Treatment and Properties (5 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (5 papers) and Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (171 citations), History (88 citations), Language and Linguistics (87 citations), Classics (24 citations) and Anthropology (46 citations). John Considine has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kevin Sharpe, J. Y. Zhu, Qianqian Wang, Kevin T. Turner, R. E. Rowlands, Carlos Báez, Derek Beales, Fabrice Pierron, Roland Gleisner and Charles G. Nauert. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Lexicography, Sixteenth Century Journal, Notes and Queries, TAPPI Journal and The Review of English Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026