Tonia Bleam

429 total citations
12 papers, 159 citations indexed

About

Tonia Bleam is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Language and Linguistics and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Tonia Bleam has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 159 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 5 papers in Language and Linguistics and 2 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Tonia Bleam's work include Natural Language Processing Techniques (7 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (4 papers) and Speech and dialogue systems (3 papers). Tonia Bleam is often cited by papers focused on Natural Language Processing Techniques (7 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (4 papers) and Speech and dialogue systems (3 papers). Tonia Bleam collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and France. Tonia Bleam's co-authors include Martha Palmer, Christine Doran, Matthew Stone, Bonnie Webber, Lyn Tieu, Alex de Carvalho, Jeffrey Lidz, Anne Christophe, Mark Dras and K. Vijay‐Shanker and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Evaluation and Program Planning and Computational Intelligence.

In The Last Decade

Tonia Bleam

10 papers receiving 137 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tonia Bleam United States 7 91 67 38 32 22 12 159
Emiliano Guevara Norway 6 132 1.5× 51 0.8× 27 0.7× 16 0.5× 12 0.5× 14 180
Viktor Trón United Kingdom 6 125 1.4× 33 0.5× 20 0.5× 25 0.8× 7 0.3× 8 172
Peter Graff United States 6 75 0.8× 66 1.0× 92 2.4× 35 1.1× 68 3.1× 14 204
Matthijs Westera Netherlands 7 70 0.8× 73 1.1× 43 1.1× 25 0.8× 9 0.4× 21 155
Beracah Yankama United States 3 63 0.7× 84 1.3× 32 0.8× 55 1.7× 14 0.6× 6 184
Екатерина Рахилина Russia 7 33 0.4× 75 1.1× 72 1.9× 18 0.6× 21 1.0× 43 146
Jill House United Kingdom 7 72 0.8× 57 0.9× 123 3.2× 27 0.8× 49 2.2× 16 190
Mike Maxwell United States 5 125 1.4× 129 1.9× 82 2.2× 17 0.5× 53 2.4× 10 218
Remi van Trijp Japan 9 96 1.1× 103 1.5× 27 0.7× 14 0.4× 17 0.8× 29 158
Eleni Gregoromichelaki United Kingdom 9 111 1.2× 137 2.0× 107 2.8× 17 0.5× 4 0.2× 19 220

Countries citing papers authored by Tonia Bleam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tonia Bleam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tonia Bleam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tonia Bleam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tonia Bleam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tonia Bleam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tonia Bleam. The network helps show where Tonia Bleam may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tonia Bleam

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tonia Bleam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tonia Bleam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tonia Bleam. Tonia Bleam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Carvalho, Alex de, Jeffrey Lidz, Lyn Tieu, Tonia Bleam, & Anne Christophe. (2016). English-speaking preschoolers can use phrasal prosody for syntactic parsing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 139(6). EL216–EL222. 19 indexed citations
2.
Bleam, Tonia, et al.. (2012). Delayed Tree-Locality, Set-locality, and Clitic Climbing. 1–9.
3.
Bleam, Tonia. (2005). The Role of Semantic Type in Differential Object Marking. Belgian Journal of Linguistics. 19. 3–27. 19 indexed citations
4.
Stone, Matthew, Christine Doran, Bonnie Webber, Tonia Bleam, & Martha Palmer. (2003). Microplanning with Communicative Intentions: The SPUD System. Computational Intelligence. 19(4). 311–381. 51 indexed citations
5.
Stone, Matthew, Christine Doran, Bonnie Webber, Tonia Bleam, & Martha Palmer. (2003). Microplanning with Communicative Intentions: The SPUD System. Computational Intelligence. 19(4). 311–381. 7 indexed citations
6.
Bleam, Tonia, Chung–hye Han, & Jeffrey Lidz. (2000). Grammatical Downsizing and The Redistribution of Semantic Wealth. Evaluation and Program Planning. 7(1). 5–101845. 1 indexed citations
7.
Dras, Mark & Tonia Bleam. (2000). How problematic are clitics for S-TAG translation?. 241–244. 6 indexed citations
8.
Stone, Matthew, Tonia Bleam, Christine Doran, & Martha Palmer. (2000). Lexicalized Grammar and the Description of Motion Events. 199–206. 8 indexed citations
9.
Xia, Fei & Tonia Bleam. (2000). A Corpus-based evaluation of syntactic locality in TAGs. 215–220. 4 indexed citations
10.
Bleam, Tonia. (1999). Leísta Spanish and the Syntax of Clitic Doubling. Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania). 36 indexed citations
11.
Bleam, Tonia. (1999). Object Bare Plurals in Spanish and the Semantics of Personal a. Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science. Series 4, Current issues in linguistic theory. 21–38. 1 indexed citations
12.
Bleam, Tonia, Martha Palmer, & K. Vijay‐Shanker. (1998). Motion verbs and semantic features in TAG. 13–16. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026