Tongdong Bai
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Cultural Studies top 10%
- Philosophy top 10%
- Religious studies top 10%
- Co-authors
- Philippe C. SchmitterYuri PinesDoh Chull ShinRuiping FanDaniel A. BellKenneth Paul TanStephen MacedoBenjamin A. Elman
- Topics
- Chinese history and philosophy (14 papers)Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers)Japanese History and Culture (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Political Science and International RelationsSociology and Political ScienceCultural Studies
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesSingapore
In The Last Decade
Tongdong Bai
17 papers receiving 157 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Sociology and Political Science 156
- Political Science and International Relations 120
- Cultural Studies 26
- Philosophy 21
- Religious studies 9
Countries citing papers authored by Tongdong Bai
This map shows the geographic impact of Tongdong Bai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tongdong Bai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tongdong Bai more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tongdong Bai
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tongdong Bai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tongdong Bai. The network helps show where Tongdong Bai may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tongdong Bai
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tongdong Bai. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tongdong Bai based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tongdong Bai. Tongdong Bai is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 37 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | China: The Political Philosophy of the Middle Kingdom | 13 |
| 12 | A Confucian Version of Hybrid Regime: How Does It Work and Why is It Superior? | 8 |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Tongdong Bai
Tongdong Bai is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 23 papers that have together received 200 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (14 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers) and Japanese History and Culture (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (120 citations), Sociology and Political Science (156 citations) and Cultural Studies (26 citations). Tongdong Bai has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Philippe C. Schmitter, Yuri Pines, Doh Chull Shin, Ruiping Fan, Daniel A. Bell, Kenneth Paul Tan, Stephen Macedo, Benjamin A. Elman, Benjamin Wong and Jiang Yi. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Philosophy East and West and Res Publica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.