Tomasz Zaleśkiewicz
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- General Decision Sciences top 2%
- Co-authors
- Agata GąsiorowskaJakub TraczykAgata SobkówPelin KesebirDafina PetrovaRocío García‐RetameroAleksandra ŁuszczyńskaTadeusz Tyszka
- Topics
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (14 papers)Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (13 papers)Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- PolandUnited StatesIsrael
In The Last Decade
Tomasz Zaleśkiewicz
43 papers receiving 814 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Sociology and Political Science 271
- Social Psychology 243
- Applied Psychology 178
- Clinical Psychology 154
- General Decision Sciences 147
Countries citing papers authored by Tomasz Zaleśkiewicz
This map shows the geographic impact of Tomasz Zaleśkiewicz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tomasz Zaleśkiewicz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tomasz Zaleśkiewicz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tomasz Zaleśkiewicz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tomasz Zaleśkiewicz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tomasz Zaleśkiewicz. The network helps show where Tomasz Zaleśkiewicz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tomasz Zaleśkiewicz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tomasz Zaleśkiewicz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tomasz Zaleśkiewicz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tomasz Zaleśkiewicz. Tomasz Zaleśkiewicz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 85 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 60 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 35 | |
| 18 | Trening współpracy/rywalizacji jako forma wpływu na zachowanie ludzi w dwuosobowej grze zaufania | 4 |
| 19 | Risk as necessity and risk as pleasure: The perception of instrumental and stimulating risks | 2 |
| 20 | 25 |
About Tomasz Zaleśkiewicz
Tomasz Zaleśkiewicz is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Applied Psychology and Safety Research, having authored 48 papers that have together received 856 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (14 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (13 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (147 citations), Applied Psychology (178 citations) and Social Psychology (243 citations). Tomasz Zaleśkiewicz has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Agata Gąsiorowska, Jakub Traczyk, Agata Sobków, Pelin Kesebir, Dafina Petrova, Rocío García‐Retamero, Aleksandra Łuszczyńska, Tadeusz Tyszka, Tom Pyszczynski and Kathleen D. Vohs. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, PLoS ONE and Journal of Cleaner Production.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.