Tom Poot

459 citations
6 papers · 314 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Tom Poot

6 papers receiving 280 citations

Peers

Tom Poot
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Strategy and Management 180
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 62
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 66
  • Economics and Econometrics 169
  • Transportation 39
Replace Terence Ping Ching Fan with:
Terence Ping Ching Fan Singapore
Despoina Filiou United Kingdom
Hsien‐Che Lai Taiwan
Claudio Frischtak Brazil
Elisabeth B. Reynolds United States
Yasushi Ueki Japan
Olena Ivus Canada
Sergio Petralia Netherlands
Justus Baron United States
Kari Jussila Finland
Tom Poot relative to Terence Ping Ching Fan Singapore Terence Ping Ching Fan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Terence Ping Ching Fan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Poot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Poot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Poot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Poot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Poot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Poot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Poot. The network helps show where Tom Poot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Tom Poot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Poot Line = papers co-authored together Tom Poot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 200991
2 199273
3 200172
4 200771
5 20085
6
Toward a Dynamic Perspective on Open Innovation: A Longitudinal Assessment of the Adoption of Internal and External Innovation Strategies in the Netherlands
20092

About Tom Poot

Tom Poot is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 6 papers that have together received 314 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation Policy and R&D (4 papers), Regional Development and Policy (2 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (2 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (1 paper), Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends (1 paper), Urban Transport and Accessibility (1 paper), Firm Innovation and Growth (1 paper) and Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (180 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (62 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (66 citations), Economics and Econometrics (169 citations) and Transportation (39 citations). Tom Poot has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alfred Kleinknecht, Dries Faems, Wim Vanhaverbeke, Piet Rietveld, Jacco Hakfoort, Cees van Beers, Erik Brouwer and Kees van Montfort. Their work appears in journals such as Regional Studies, Research Policy, International Journal of Innovation Management, De Economist and University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact