Tom L. Broderick
- Physiology top 10%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jolanta GutkowskaMarek JankowskiPaul PoirierBogdan DanalacheÉric PlanteAhmed MénaouarH. Arthur QuinneyDonghao Wang
- Topics
- Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (8 papers)Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (7 papers)Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (7 papers)
- Cited by
- Endocrine and Autonomic SystemsBehavioral NeuroscienceCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaDenmark
In The Last Decade
Tom L. Broderick
31 papers receiving 806 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Physiology 228
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 220
- Molecular Biology 183
- Social Psychology 160
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 152
Countries citing papers authored by Tom L. Broderick
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom L. Broderick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom L. Broderick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom L. Broderick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tom L. Broderick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom L. Broderick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom L. Broderick. The network helps show where Tom L. Broderick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tom L. Broderick
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tom L. Broderick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tom L. Broderick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tom L. Broderick. Tom L. Broderick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28 | |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 28 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 48 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 96 | |
| 9 | 63 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 44 | |
| 13 | 32 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 61 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 44 | |
| 20 | 14 |
About Tom L. Broderick
Tom L. Broderick is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Behavioral Neuroscience and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 32 papers that have together received 822 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (8 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (7 papers) and Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (152 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (62 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (220 citations). Tom L. Broderick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Jolanta Gutkowska, Marek Jankowski, Paul Poirier, Bogdan Danalache, Éric Plante, Ahmed Ménaouar, H. Arthur Quinney, Donghao Wang, Gary D. Lopaschuk and Jean‐Louis Chiasson. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, The Journal of Physiology and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.