Tom Gordon‐Hecker

14 papers receiving 213 citations

Peers

Tom Gordon‐Hecker
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • General Decision Sciences 21
  • Safety Research 75
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 103
  • Information Systems and Management 36
  • Marketing 29
Replace Kyle D. Dillon with:
Kyle D. Dillon United States
Ignazio Ziano France
Richard Rau Germany
Kim Floyd United States
Mathias Twardawski Germany
Shalom Noach Jaffe United States
Andre Hofmeyr South Africa
Evan Weingarten United States
Lena Fanya Aeschbach Switzerland
Chongzeng Bi China
Tom Gordon‐Hecker relative to Kyle D. Dillon United States Kyle D. Dillon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Kyle D. Dillon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Gordon‐Hecker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Gordon‐Hecker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Gordon‐Hecker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Gordon‐Hecker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Gordon‐Hecker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Gordon‐Hecker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Gordon‐Hecker. The network helps show where Tom Gordon‐Hecker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Tom Gordon‐Hecker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Gordon‐Hecker Line = papers co-authored together Tom Gordon‐Hecker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201578
2 201930
3 201725
4 202423
5 202217
6 202214
7 201914
8 20227
9 20234
10 20253
11 20222
12 20202
13 20231
14 20241
15 20240

About Tom Gordon‐Hecker

Tom Gordon‐Hecker is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research, General Decision Sciences and Social Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 221 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (7 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (1 paper), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (1 paper) and Sleep and Wakefulness Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (21 citations), Safety Research (75 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (103 citations), Information Systems and Management (36 citations) and Marketing (29 citations). Tom Gordon‐Hecker has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Andrea Pittarello, Shaul Shalvi, Margarita Leib, Marieke Roskes, Shoham Choshen‐Hillel, Yoella Bereby‐Meyer, Anat Perry, Tehila Kogut, David Gozal and Alex Gileles‐Hillel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Psychological Science and Social Psychological and Personality Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact