Tom De Luca

687 total citations
4 papers, 394 citations indexed

About

Tom De Luca is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance. According to data from OpenAlex, Tom De Luca has authored 4 papers receiving a total of 394 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 1 paper in Sociology and Political Science and 1 paper in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance. Recurrent topics in Tom De Luca's work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 paper), Law, Rights, and Freedoms (1 paper) and International Development and Aid (1 paper). Tom De Luca is often cited by papers focused on American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 paper), Law, Rights, and Freedoms (1 paper) and International Development and Aid (1 paper). Tom De Luca collaborates with scholars based in United States. Tom De Luca's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as Perspectives on Politics, New Political Science and New York University Press eBooks.

In The Last Decade

Tom De Luca

3 papers receiving 352 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Tom De Luca United States	2	274	119	82	71	58	4	394
David Detomasi Canada	5	240 0.9×	73 0.6×	78 1.0×	63 0.9×	34 0.6×	8	319
Halina Ward United Kingdom	7	277 1.0×	99 0.8×	78 1.0×	61 0.9×	39 0.7×	15	397
Steen Vallentin Denmark	9	219 0.8×	88 0.7×	116 1.4×	69 1.0×	59 1.0×	33	365
Linda O’Riordan Germany	4	334 1.2×	212 1.8×	84 1.0×	58 0.8×	66 1.1×	8	449
Michael Behnam United States	9	186 0.7×	96 0.8×	92 1.1×	37 0.5×	61 1.1×	26	306
Shawn Pope United States	9	246 0.9×	172 1.4×	64 0.8×	106 1.5×	35 0.6×	15	400
Maria Joutsenvirta Finland	7	173 0.6×	56 0.5×	120 1.5×	91 1.3×	40 0.7×	11	345
Dorothea Baur Switzerland	7	295 1.1×	95 0.8×	94 1.1×	187 2.6×	61 1.1×	14	511
Marina Prieto-Carrón United Kingdom	5	244 0.9×	83 0.7×	53 0.6×	84 1.2×	44 0.8×	6	388
Jörg Andriof United Kingdom	5	226 0.8×	108 0.9×	99 1.2×	78 1.1×	50 0.9×	6	346

Countries citing papers authored by Tom De Luca

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom De Luca's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom De Luca with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom De Luca more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom De Luca

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom De Luca. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom De Luca. The network helps show where Tom De Luca may publish in the future.

No nodes

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

4 of 4 papers shown

1.

Luca, Tom De, et al.. (2020). Liars! Cheaters! Evildoers!. New York University Press eBooks.

2.

Luca, Tom De. (2007). Free Speech, Political Equality, and Campaign Finance Reform: A Paradox for Democracy?. New Political Science. 29(2). 145–166. 1 indexed citations

3.

Luca, Tom De. (2006). The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility. Perspectives on Politics. 4(2). 372–373. 392 indexed citations

4.

Luca, Tom De, et al.. (2006). Free Trade: A Paradox for Democracy. New Political Science. 28(4). 507–525. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact