Tod Rutherford

38 papers receiving 385 citations

Peers

Tod Rutherford
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Strategy and Management 180
  • Economics and Econometrics 124
  • Public Administration 111
  • Sociology and Political Science 96
  • Political Science and International Relations 94
Replace Folker Fröbel with:
Folker Fröbel
Otto Kreye
Guido Starosta Argentina
José Manuel Salazar-Xirinachs United States
Jürgen Heinrichs
Phillip Toner Australia
Helmut Voelzkow Germany
Florian Butollo Germany
Anette Haas Germany
Andries Bezuidenhout South Africa
Tod Rutherford relative to Folker Fröbel Folker Fröbel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Folker Fröbel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tod Rutherford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tod Rutherford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tod Rutherford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tod Rutherford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tod Rutherford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tod Rutherford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tod Rutherford. The network helps show where Tod Rutherford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tod Rutherford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tod Rutherford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tod Rutherford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tod Rutherford. Tod Rutherford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 3
2 5
3 6
4 8
5 35
6
The Flea on the Tail of the Dog: Power in Global Production Networks and the Restructuring of Canadian Automotive Clusters
0
7 13
8 4
9 9
10
INNOVATION IN THE AUTOMOTIVE PARTS INDUSTRY: A CASE STUDY OF THE WINDSOR-ESSEX REGION
4
11 1
12
Global, local or hybrid?: Evidence of adaptation among Japanese automobile plants in Japan, the United States and Canada
6
13 7
14 4
15 6
16 6
17 8
18 9
19 14
20
Industrial restructuring, local labour markets and social change : the transformation of south Wales /
2

About Tod Rutherford

Tod Rutherford is a scholar working on Public Administration, Urban Studies and Strategy and Management, having authored 40 papers that have together received 428 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (23 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (16 papers) and Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (111 citations), Business and International Management (26 citations) and Strategy and Management (180 citations). Tod Rutherford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John Holmes, Meric S. Gertler, Gregor Murray, Phil Almond, Tom McIntosh, Peter Williams, Jonathan V. Beaverstock, Nigel Thrift, Andrew Leyshon and Jonathan Morris. Their work appears in journals such as Progress in Human Geography, Environment and Planning A Economy and Space and Regional Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026