Peter Williams

3.6k citations
97 papers · 2.7k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Williams

91 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Peter Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 172
  • Radiation 1.5k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.1k
  • Family Practice 86
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 989
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 250
Replace David Hardy with:
David Hardy France
Sara Y. Brucker Germany
Eric van Rongen Netherlands
Emiliano D’Agostino United States
Heather Jones United States
Michael McCarthy United States
Andrew S. Wright United States
Nathan Green United States
William J. Donnelly Australia
Paulo Schor Brazil
Peter Williams relative to David Hardy France David Hardy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.4×
David Hardy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Williams. The network helps show where Peter Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Williams Line = papers co-authored together Peter Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 97 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001254
2 1994172
3 2005156
4 1990130
5 199596
6 199585
7 200583
8 200572
9 198367
10 199264
11 200863
12
Crop quality evaluation methods and guidelines.
198663
13 199362
14 200060
15 200060
16 200358
17 199856
18 201154
19 199752
20 200848

About Peter Williams

Peter Williams is a scholar working on Radiation, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Plant Science and Insect Science, having authored 97 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (35 papers), Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (16 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (15 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (13 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (12 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (8 papers), Radiation Effects and Dosimetry (8 papers) and Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (1.5k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.1k citations), Family Practice (86 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (989 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (250 citations). Peter Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jack Coulehan, Mike Kirby, S C Lillicrap, J. Raymond Williams, G. Budgell, R. Mackay, J.H. Hendry, B. Owen, Tom Marchant and Ben J. Mijnheer. Their work appears in journals such as Physics in Medicine and Biology, British Journal of Radiology, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Journal of Stored Products Research and International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact