Ting Cao
About
In The Last Decade
Ting Cao
54 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Molecular Biology 635
- Cancer Research 186
- Cell Biology 138
- Epidemiology 119
- Physiology 114
Countries citing papers authored by Ting Cao
This map shows the geographic impact of Ting Cao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ting Cao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ting Cao more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ting Cao
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ting Cao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ting Cao. The network helps show where Ting Cao may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ting Cao
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ting Cao. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ting Cao based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ting Cao. Ting Cao is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 30 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 47 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 25 | |
| 20 | 29 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.