Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Social exclusion of older persons: a scoping review and conceptual framework
2016268 citationsKieran Walsh, Thomas Scharf et al.European Journal of Ageingprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Norah Keating's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Norah Keating with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Norah Keating more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Norah Keating. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Norah Keating. The network helps show where Norah Keating may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Norah Keating
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Norah Keating.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Norah Keating based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Norah Keating. Norah Keating is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Anderson, Sharon, Norah Keating, & Donna M. Wilson. (2017). Reconciling Marriage and Care after Stroke. Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement. 36(3). 386–401.17 indexed citations
4.
Anderson, Sharon, et al.. (2016). Translating Knowledge. Health Promotion Practice. 18(1). 15–25.34 indexed citations
5.
Walsh, Kieran, Thomas Scharf, & Norah Keating. (2016). Social exclusion of older persons: a scoping review and conceptual framework. European Journal of Ageing. 14(1). 81–98.268 indexed citations breakdown →
Gierveld, Jenny de Jong, Norah Keating, & Janet Fast. (2015). Determinants of Loneliness among Older Adults in Canada. Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement. 34(2). 125–136.116 indexed citations
9.
Eales, Jacquie, et al.. (2013). Below the surface: Managing the life of collaborative research projects. UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol).
Keating, Norah, Jennifer Swindle, & Stephanie Fletcher. (2011). Aging in Rural Canada: A Retrospective and Review. Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement. 30(3). 323–338.75 indexed citations
13.
Menec, Verena, Robin Means, Norah Keating, Graham Parkhurst, & Jacquie Eales. (2011). Conceptualizing Age-Friendly Communities. Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement. 30(3). 479–493.254 indexed citations
Keating, Norah. (1995). Book Reviews -- Families in Troubled Times. Adapting to Change in Rural America by Rand D. Conger and Glen H. Elder Jr. Family Relations. 44(1). 121.1 indexed citations
18.
Keating, Norah, et al.. (1992). Making Sense Out of Feeling Different: The Experience of Menopause. Canadian women's studies. 12(2).1 indexed citations
Keating, Norah. (1987). The Whole Economy: Resource Allocation of Alberta Farm Women and Men.. 37(3).4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.