Tina Strombach

709 total citations
9 papers, 493 citations indexed

About

Tina Strombach is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Safety Research and Applied Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Tina Strombach has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 493 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in General Decision Sciences, 4 papers in Safety Research and 4 papers in Applied Psychology. Recurrent topics in Tina Strombach's work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (5 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers). Tina Strombach is often cited by papers focused on Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (5 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers). Tina Strombach collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Netherlands. Tina Strombach's co-authors include Tobias Kalenscher, Philippe N. Tobler, Peter Kenning, Bernd Weber, Alexander Soutschek, Iliana I. Karipidis, Christian C. Ruff, Marijn van Wingerden, Lars Schwabe and Marian Joëls and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Science Advances.

In The Last Decade

Tina Strombach

9 papers receiving 475 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Tina Strombach Germany	9	263	164	145	105	95	9	493
Nadège Bault France	9	198 0.8×	99 0.6×	91 0.6×	65 0.6×	66 0.7×	14	473
Liviu G. Crişan Romania	8	151 0.6×	146 0.9×	189 1.3×	67 0.6×	131 1.4×	9	561
Jenifer Z. Siegel United Kingdom	10	466 1.8×	231 1.4×	172 1.2×	196 1.9×	65 0.7×	14	706
Neeltje E. Blankenstein Netherlands	13	227 0.9×	127 0.8×	167 1.2×	51 0.5×	96 1.0×	21	554
Sabrina Strang Germany	12	211 0.8×	210 1.3×	131 0.9×	107 1.0×	42 0.4×	15	478
Gabriele Chierchia United Kingdom	11	273 1.0×	113 0.7×	118 0.8×	90 0.9×	43 0.5×	18	507
Chelsea Helion United States	10	284 1.1×	179 1.1×	142 1.0×	99 0.9×	41 0.4×	28	630
Lital Ruderman United States	10	352 1.3×	85 0.5×	184 1.3×	69 0.7×	127 1.3×	14	755
Sunhae Sul South Korea	11	250 1.0×	182 1.1×	85 0.6×	84 0.8×	61 0.6×	26	432
Xiuyan Guo China	15	332 1.3×	86 0.5×	183 1.3×	84 0.8×	39 0.4×	47	490

Countries citing papers authored by Tina Strombach

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tina Strombach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tina Strombach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tina Strombach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tina Strombach

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tina Strombach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tina Strombach. The network helps show where Tina Strombach may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tina Strombach

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tina Strombach. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tina Strombach based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tina Strombach. Tina Strombach is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Strombach, Tina, Sabrina Strang, Soyoung Q. Park, & P. Kenning. (2016). Common and distinctive approaches to motivation in different disciplines. Progress in brain research. 229. 3–23. 15 indexed citations

2.

Strombach, Tina, et al.. (2016). Gender-Specific Effects of Cognitive Load on Social Discounting. PLoS ONE. 11(10). e0165289–e0165289. 18 indexed citations

3.

Strang, Sabrina, Soyoung Q. Park, Tina Strombach, & P. Kenning. (2016). Applied economics. Progress in brain research. 229. 285–301. 11 indexed citations

4.

Soutschek, Alexander, Christian C. Ruff, Tina Strombach, Tobias Kalenscher, & Philippe N. Tobler. (2016). Brain stimulation reveals crucial role of overcoming self-centeredness in self-control. Science Advances. 2(10). e1600992–e1600992. 106 indexed citations

5.

Strombach, Tina, et al.. (2015). A friend in need: Time-dependent effects of stress on social discounting in men. Hormones and Behavior. 73. 75–82. 86 indexed citations

6.

Nave, Gideon, et al.. (2015). Exogenous cortisol causes a shift from deliberative to intuitive thinking. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 64. 131–135. 36 indexed citations

7.

Strombach, Tina, Bernd Weber, Peter Kenning, et al.. (2015). Social discounting involves modulation of neural value signals by temporoparietal junction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 112(5). 1619–1624. 149 indexed citations

8.

Strombach, Tina, Marco Hubert, & Peter Kenning. (2015). The neural underpinnings of performance-based incentives. Journal of Economic Psychology. 50. 1–12. 9 indexed citations

9.

Strombach, Tina, Jia Jin, Bernd Weber, et al.. (2013). Charity Begins at Home: Cultural Differences in Social Discounting and Generosity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 27(3). 235–245. 63 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact