Tina Spies

782 total citations
10 papers, 37 citations indexed

About

Tina Spies is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, History and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, Tina Spies has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 37 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 2 papers in History and 2 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in Tina Spies's work include Cultural Identity and Representation (2 papers), Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis (2 papers) and Sociology and Education Studies (2 papers). Tina Spies is often cited by papers focused on Cultural Identity and Representation (2 papers), Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis (2 papers) and Sociology and Education Studies (2 papers). Tina Spies collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Czechia and Austria. Tina Spies's co-authors include Elisabeth Tuider, Hella von Unger, Erol Yıldız, Irini Siouti, Saša Bosančić, Boris Traue, Lisa Pfahl, Ewa Palenga‐Möllenbeck, Joost Zaat and Akke K. van der Bij and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Forum qualitative Sozialforschung and Huisarts en Wetenschap.

In The Last Decade

Tina Spies

8 papers receiving 23 citations

Peers

Tina Spies
Comparison fields: 5 of 20
  • Sociology and Political Science 20
  • Political Science and International Relations 13
  • Education 3
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 3
  • General Health Professions 2
Replace Raj Kollmorgen with:
Raj Kollmorgen Germany
Heike Delitz Germany
Herbert Willems Germany
Mark Terkessidis
Bettina Lösch Germany
Justice Albie Sachs
Oliver Dimbath Germany
Carlos Fraenkel Canada
David McDowall
Jörg Dünne Germany
Raj Kollmorgen Germany View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Tina Spies
Tina Spies · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Tina Spies
Tina Spies · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Tina Spies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tina Spies's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tina Spies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tina Spies more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tina Spies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tina Spies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tina Spies. The network helps show where Tina Spies may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tina Spies

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tina Spies. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tina Spies based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tina Spies. Tina Spies is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 3
2 0
3 1
4 5
5 4
6 6
7
Discourse, Subject, and Agency. Linking Discourse Analysis and Biographical Research with the Help of the Concept of Articulation
2
8 1
9 13
10
De kwaliteit van de NHG-Standaarden. Beoordeling van 130 kernaanbevelingen uit 28 standaarden.
2

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026