Joost Zaat

841 total citations
28 papers, 601 citations indexed

About

Joost Zaat is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Joost Zaat has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 601 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 5 papers in General Health Professions and 5 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Joost Zaat's work include Clinical practice guidelines implementation (8 papers), Medical Research and Practices (5 papers) and Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics (4 papers). Joost Zaat is often cited by papers focused on Clinical practice guidelines implementation (8 papers), Medical Research and Practices (5 papers) and Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics (4 papers). Joost Zaat collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands. Joost Zaat's co-authors include J. Th. M. van Eijk, Jacques ThM. van Eijk, Jako Burgers, Richard Grol, Henk Mokkink, T. H. Spies, Akke K. van der Bij, Anton M. Polderman, T Mank and Lucien E. M. Duijm and has published in prestigious journals such as Medical Care, Patient Education and Counseling and Tropical Medicine & International Health.

In The Last Decade

Joost Zaat

25 papers receiving 545 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Joost Zaat Netherlands 10 178 140 118 115 75 28 601
Ana Maria Bonametti Brazil 12 40 0.2× 48 0.3× 56 0.5× 88 0.8× 25 0.3× 27 644
Yolanda Mueller Switzerland 15 130 0.7× 277 2.0× 74 0.6× 60 0.5× 5 0.1× 68 737
Kristine M. Thompson United States 13 77 0.4× 114 0.8× 8 0.1× 44 0.4× 28 0.4× 30 540
Dominik Glinz Switzerland 17 106 0.6× 96 0.7× 357 3.0× 52 0.5× 19 0.3× 26 908
Pirom Kamolratanakul Thailand 13 78 0.4× 99 0.7× 18 0.2× 228 2.0× 20 0.3× 36 660
Robert Zackin United States 19 84 0.5× 83 0.6× 33 0.3× 1.1k 9.4× 22 0.3× 30 1.6k
Assefa Getachew Ethiopia 13 38 0.2× 87 0.6× 101 0.9× 276 2.4× 11 0.1× 20 535
Juliana de Oliveira Costa Brazil 15 83 0.5× 50 0.4× 6 0.1× 115 1.0× 17 0.2× 53 620
Madhuri Kulkarni India 11 22 0.1× 83 0.6× 85 0.7× 299 2.6× 12 0.2× 30 641
Bazil Baltazar Kavishe Tanzania 11 46 0.3× 92 0.7× 17 0.1× 113 1.0× 8 0.1× 20 607

Countries citing papers authored by Joost Zaat

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joost Zaat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joost Zaat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joost Zaat more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joost Zaat

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joost Zaat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joost Zaat. The network helps show where Joost Zaat may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joost Zaat

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joost Zaat. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joost Zaat based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joost Zaat. Joost Zaat is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Zaat, Joost, et al.. (2008). [Two-thirds of doctors are female, but ever still behind].. PubMed. 152(40). 2153–4. 2 indexed citations
2.
Zaat, Joost. (2006). Gemiddelde huisartsen. Huisarts en Wetenschap. 49(1). 11–12.
3.
Zaat, Joost, et al.. (2004). Wie onderzoekt wat?. Huisarts en Wetenschap. 47(12). 108–115. 3 indexed citations
4.
Zaat, Joost. (2004). Moet testgebruik wel verbeterd worden?. Huisarts en Wetenschap. 47(3). 813–814. 1 indexed citations
5.
Burgers, Jako, et al.. (2003). Internationaler Vergleich von 19 Leitlinien-Programmen--Eine Ubersicht der AGREE Collaboration. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 97(1). 81–88.
6.
Zaat, Joost. (2003). Nieuwe richtlijnen voor rapportage over diagnostisch onderzoek. Huisarts en Wetenschap. 46(3). 806–806.
7.
Burgers, Jako, et al.. (2002). De kwaliteit van de NHG-Standaarden. Beoordeling van 130 kernaanbevelingen uit 28 standaarden.. Huisarts en Wetenschap. 45. 349–353. 2 indexed citations
8.
Blankenstein, Annette H., Henriëtte E. van der Horst, Joost Zaat, et al.. (2002). Development and feasibility of a modified reattribution model for somatising patients, applied by their own general practitioners. Patient Education and Counseling. 47(3). 229–235. 35 indexed citations
9.
Mank, Theo G. & Joost Zaat. (2001). Diagnostic advantages and therapeutic options for giardiasis. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs. 10(8). 1513–1519. 11 indexed citations
10.
Zaat, Joost. (2001). Dertien nieuwe nummers. Huisarts en Wetenschap. 44(1). 834–835. 1 indexed citations
11.
Duijm, Lucien E. M., Joost Zaat, & Gerard L. Guit. (1998). [Mammographic surveillance of breast cancer patient relatives; implementation of guidelines formulated by the Netherlands College of General Practitioners].. PubMed. 142(14). 778–81. 1 indexed citations
12.
Duijm, Lucien E. M., Gerard L. Guit, Jean Harris Hendriks, Joost Zaat, & Willem P.Th.M. Mali. (1998). Value of breast imaging in women with painful breasts: observational follow up study. BMJ. 317(7171). 1492–1495. 67 indexed citations
13.
Zaat, Joost, et al.. (1997). A systematic review on the treatment of giardiasis. Tropical Medicine & International Health. 2(1). 63–82. 47 indexed citations
14.
Mank, T, Joost Zaat, A.M. Deelder, J. Th. M. van Eijk, & Anton M. Polderman. (1997). Sensitivity of microscopy versus enzyme immunoassay in the laboratory diagnosis of giardiasis. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 16(8). 615–619. 71 indexed citations
15.
Duijm, Lucien E. M., Gerard L. Guit, & Joost Zaat. (1997). Mammographic surveillance of asymptomatic breast cancer relatives in general practice: rate of re-attendance and GP- and patient-related barriers. Family Practice. 14(6). 450–454. 7 indexed citations
16.
Garner, Paul, et al.. (1996). Tropical medicine on trial: Getting hold of all the evidence. Parasitology Today. 12(6). 211–212. 2 indexed citations
17.
Zaat, Joost, François Schellevis, Jacques ThM. van Eijk, & Koos van der Velden. (1995). Do out-of-office laboratory tests affect diagnoses in general practice?. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care. 13(1). 46–51. 7 indexed citations
18.
Mank, T, Joost Zaat, J. Blotkamp, & Anton M. Polderman. (1995). Comparison of fresh versus sodium acetate acetic acid formalin preserved stool specimens for diagnosis of intestinal protozoal infections. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 14(12). 1076–1081. 28 indexed citations
19.
Zaat, Joost & J. Th. M. van Eijk. (1992). General Practitioners?? Uncertainty, Risk Preference, and Use of Laboratory Tests. Medical Care. 30(9). 846–854. 63 indexed citations
20.
Zaat, Joost, et al.. (1992). Laboratory Test Form Design Influences Test Ordering by General Practitioners in the Netherlands. Medical Care. 30(3). 189–198. 76 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026