Timothy Redmond

15 papers receiving 179 citations

Peers

Timothy Redmond
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 27
  • Management Information Systems 38
  • Algebra and Number Theory 19
  • Signal Processing 44
  • Artificial Intelligence 120
Replace Kevin J. Compton with:
Kevin J. Compton United States
Michael Kaminski Israel
Massimiliano Sala Italy
Ernst–Erich Doberkat Germany
Roger Villemaire Canada
Richard Statman United States
D. A. Wolfram Australia
E. Dubinsky United States
J. Donald Monk United States
Mikołaj Bojańczyk Poland
Timothy Redmond relative to Kevin J. Compton United States Kevin J. Compton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Kevin J. Compton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Timothy Redmond

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Timothy Redmond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Timothy Redmond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Timothy Redmond more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Timothy Redmond

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Timothy Redmond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Timothy Redmond. The network helps show where Timothy Redmond may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Timothy Redmond, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Timothy Redmond Line = papers co-authored together Timothy Redmond links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 200232
2 201226
3 200625
4
Supporting early adoption of OWL 1.1 with Protégé-OWL and FaCT++
200620
5
Managing Change: An Ontology Version Control System.
200817
6 200017
7 200815
8 200114
9 200912
10 20059
11 20085
12 20254
13
An Open Source Database Backend for the OWL API and Protege 4.
20103
14
A Model-Theoretic Approach to Specifying, Verifying and Hooking Up Security Policies.
19883
15 20023
16 20021

About Timothy Redmond

Timothy Redmond is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications, Applied Mathematics and Molecular Biology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 206 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semantic Web and Ontologies (6 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (4 papers), Mathematical functions and polynomials (4 papers), Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (3 papers), Security and Verification in Computing (3 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (3 papers), Network Security and Intrusion Detection (3 papers) and Matrix Theory and Algorithms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (27 citations), Management Information Systems (38 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (19 citations), Signal Processing (44 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (120 citations). Timothy Redmond has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Charles Ryavec, Ömer Eğeci̇oğlu, Matthew Horridge, Hans-Georg Fill, Dimitris Karagiannis, Tania Tudorache, Nick Drummond, Dmitry Tsarkov, Michael E. Smith and Mark A. Musen. Their work appears in journals such as The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, CIN Computers Informatics Nursing, Computer Networks, Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A and Nucleic Acids Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact