Timothy McBride

967 citations
36 papers · 749 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Timothy McBride

31 papers receiving 712 citations

Peers

Timothy McBride
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • General Health Professions 401
  • Health 126
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 33
  • Demography 73
  • Economics and Econometrics 154
Replace Matthijs van den Berg with:
Matthijs van den Berg Netherlands
Yanbing Zeng China
Ansgar Wübker Germany
Myo Nyein Aung Japan
Julia Yoshino Benavente United States
Emily B. Zimmerman United States
Travonia Hughes United States
Nelly Salgado de Snyder Mexico
Amy Chesser United States
Zhihong Sa China
Timothy McBride relative to Matthijs van den Berg Netherlands Matthijs van den Berg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Matthijs van den Berg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Timothy McBride

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Timothy McBride's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Timothy McBride with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Timothy McBride more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Timothy McBride

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Timothy McBride. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Timothy McBride. The network helps show where Timothy McBride may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Timothy McBride, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Timothy McBride Line = papers co-authored together Timothy McBride links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010115
2 199178
3 201778
4 199463
5 201349
6 201337
7 201034
8 201932
9 201632
10 200829
11 202029
12 199728
13 201724
14 201521
15 201614
16 201613
17 202211
18
Colorado Prehistory: A Context for the Platte River Basin
200411
19 201611
20 20048

About Timothy McBride

Timothy McBride is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Demography, Sociology and Political Science and Health, having authored 36 papers that have together received 749 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Policy and Management (11 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (11 papers), Global Health Care Issues (3 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (3 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (3 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (3 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (2 papers) and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (401 citations), Health (126 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (33 citations), Demography (73 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (154 citations). Timothy McBride has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Korbin Liu, Teresa A. Coughlin, Kathleen N. Gillespie, Santosh Krishna, Mary C. Politi, Kimberly A. Kaphingst, Enbal Shacham, Jingxia Liu, Matthew W. Kreuter and Amy Nunn. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, The Journal of Rural Health, BMC Health Services Research, Medical Care and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact