Timothy C. Ford

18 papers receiving 341 citations

Peers

Timothy C. Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Information Systems and Management 73
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 74
  • Marketing 62
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 57
  • Strategy and Management 92
Replace Pedro Verga Matos with:
Pedro Verga Matos Portugal
Matina Ghasemi Cyprus
Matthias Fink Germany
Roger C. Y. Chen Taiwan
Yazan Khalid Abed‐Allah Migdadi Jordan
Dechun Huang China
Marco Benvenuto Italy
Yu-Chen Lin Taiwan
Chih-Yi Hsiao China
Philippe Gagnepain Spain
Timothy C. Ford relative to Pedro Verga Matos Portugal Pedro Verga Matos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
Pedro Verga Matos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Timothy C. Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Timothy C. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Timothy C. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Timothy C. Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Timothy C. Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Timothy C. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Timothy C. Ford. The network helps show where Timothy C. Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Timothy C. Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Timothy C. Ford Line = papers co-authored together Timothy C. Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2004127
2 200786
3 200652
4 200522
5 200816
6 201015
7 200212
8 200412
9 199511
10 19929
11 20098
12 20207
13 20214
14 20214
15 20061
16 20131
17 19861
18 19901
19 20230
20 20100

About Timothy C. Ford

Timothy C. Ford is a scholar working on Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Economics and Econometrics and Strategy and Management, having authored 20 papers that have together received 389 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Foot and Ankle Surgery (7 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (5 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (4 papers), Global trade and economics (3 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (2 papers), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (2 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (2 papers) and Tendon Structure and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (73 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (74 citations), Marketing (62 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (57 citations) and Strategy and Management (92 citations). Timothy C. Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and India. Frequent co-authors include M. Adam Mahmood, Kallol Bagchi, Jonathan C. Rork, Bruce Elmslie, James T. Lane, Timothy E. Moore, Brian Logan, Jennifer L. Larsen, Judi Erickson and Julie A. Stoner. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, Diabetes Care, Journal of Urban Economics and International Journal of Electronic Commerce.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact