Joseph C. Anderson

14.9k total citations · 3 hit papers
202 papers, 9.9k citations indexed

About

Joseph C. Anderson is a scholar working on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Joseph C. Anderson has authored 202 papers receiving a total of 9.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 139 papers in Oncology, 128 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 51 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Joseph C. Anderson's work include Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (135 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (116 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (50 papers). Joseph C. Anderson is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (135 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (116 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (50 papers). Joseph C. Anderson collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Italy. Joseph C. Anderson's co-authors include Lynn F. Butterly, Rebecca L. Siegel, Stacey A. Fedewa, Ahmedin Jemal, Robert A. Smith, Ann Goding Sauer, Kimberly D. Miller, Andrea Cercek, Douglas K. Rex and Carol A. Burke and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Annals of Internal Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Joseph C. Anderson

189 papers receiving 9.7k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories sort by overperformance

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020

2020 3.6k citations Rebecca L. Siegel, Kimberly D. Miller et al. CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians profile →
American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer Screening 2008

2009 1.1k citations Douglas K. Rex, Joseph C. Anderson et al. The American Journal of Gastroenterology profile →
Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

2020 272 citations Joseph C. Anderson, Carol A. Burke et al. Gastroenterology profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Joseph C. Anderson United States	40	6.8k	4.5k	2.3k	2.2k	1.4k	202	9.9k
Robert E. Schoen United States	55	6.6k 1.0×	3.9k 0.9×	2.8k 1.2×	2.0k 0.9×	1.9k 1.3×	234	10.7k
Dennis J. Ahnen United States	41	5.9k 0.9×	3.3k 0.7×	2.6k 1.2×	1.8k 0.8×	2.0k 1.4×	93	9.3k
Wendy Atkin United Kingdom	51	9.3k 1.4×	4.9k 1.1×	3.7k 1.6×	2.6k 1.2×	973 0.7×	155	11.4k
Durado Brooks United States	27	9.1k 1.3×	5.2k 1.2×	3.1k 1.4×	1.8k 0.8×	1.3k 0.9×	45	12.3k
Tamas Hickish United Kingdom	45	10.2k 1.5×	4.3k 1.0×	2.3k 1.0×	3.1k 1.4×	1.6k 1.1×	145	13.5k
Bernard Levin United States	46	6.4k 1.0×	3.4k 0.8×	3.1k 1.4×	2.6k 1.2×	1.7k 1.2×	165	11.1k
Robert C. Kurtz United States	39	6.0k 0.9×	4.0k 0.9×	2.4k 1.1×	2.5k 1.1×	802 0.6×	118	8.4k
Timothy Price Australia	48	10.7k 1.6×	5.0k 1.1×	3.1k 1.4×	2.8k 1.3×	2.8k 2.0×	476	14.8k
Patrick J. Flynn United States	51	6.9k 1.0×	2.6k 0.6×	2.2k 1.0×	1.4k 0.6×	2.2k 1.5×	145	11.1k
Bruno Vincenzi Italy	55	6.2k 0.9×	3.2k 0.7×	1.2k 0.5×	1.6k 0.7×	2.6k 1.8×	428	11.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Joseph C. Anderson

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph C. Anderson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph C. Anderson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph C. Anderson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph C. Anderson

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph C. Anderson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph C. Anderson. The network helps show where Joseph C. Anderson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joseph C. Anderson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joseph C. Anderson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joseph C. Anderson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joseph C. Anderson. Joseph C. Anderson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Jacobson, Brian C., Joseph C. Anderson, Carol A. Burke, et al.. (2025). Optimizing Bowel Preparation Quality for Colonoscopy: Consensus Recommendations by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 168(4). 798–829. 2 indexed citations

Greene, Mallik, et al.. (2025). Closing the loop in colorectal cancer screening: real-world adherence to follow-up colonoscopy after positive mt-sDNA vs FIT/FOBT, stratified by payer type. Current Medical Research and Opinion. 41(9). 1629–1639. 1 indexed citations

Anderson, Joseph C., et al.. (2025). Adenoma Detection Rates Calculated Using All Examinations Are Associated With Lower Risk for Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer: Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 121(2). 446–452. 1 indexed citations

MacKenzie, Todd A., et al.. (2024). Which is the better polyp detection metric: adenomas per colonoscopy or adenoma detection rate? A simulation modeling study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 12(11). E1366–E1373.

MacKenzie, Todd A., et al.. (2024). Association between Colonoscopy Sedation Type and Polyp Detection: A Registry-based Cohort Study. Anesthesiology. 140(6). 1088–1097. 3 indexed citations

Pohl, Heiko, Swapna Gayam, Daniel von Renteln, et al.. (2023). Carbon emissions from a FIT versus a colonoscopy screening program – environmental impact of travel and waste. Endoscopy. 55(S 02). S74–S74. 1 indexed citations

Butterly, Lynn F., et al.. (2023). What Do ‘False-Positive’ Stool Tests Really Mean? Data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

Djinbachian, Roupen, et al.. (2023). Risk of total metachronous advanced neoplasia at surveillance colonoscopy after detection of serrated lesions: a matched case–cohort study. Endoscopy. 55(8). 728–736. 6 indexed citations

Anderson, Joseph C., et al.. (2022). Colonoscopy Findings in FIT+ and mt-sDNA+ Patients versus in Colonoscopy-only Patients: New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry Data. Cancer Prevention Research. 15(7). 455–464. 9 indexed citations

10.

Anderson, Joseph C., et al.. (2022). Serrated Polyp Yield at Colonoscopy in Patients with Positive FIT, Positive mt-sDNA, and Colonoscopy Only: Data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 32(2). 226–232. 6 indexed citations

11.

Siegel, Rebecca L., Kimberly D. Miller, Ann Goding Sauer, et al.. (2020). Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 70(3). 145–164. 3624 indexed citations breakdown →

12.

Anderson, Joseph C. & Amitabh Srivastava. (2020). Colorectal Cancer Screening for the Serrated Pathway. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America. 30(3). 457–478. 15 indexed citations

13.

Jodal, Henriette C., Lise Mørkved Helsingen, Joseph C. Anderson, et al.. (2019). Colorectal cancer screening with faecal testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 9(10). e032773–e032773. 85 indexed citations

14.

Drew, David A., Allen Mo, James J. Grady, et al.. (2017). Proximal Aberrant Crypt Foci Associate with Synchronous Neoplasia and Are Primed for Neoplastic Progression. Molecular Cancer Research. 16(3). 486–495. 9 indexed citations

15.

Anderson, Joseph C.. (2015). Water-Aided Colonoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America. 25(2). 211–226. 19 indexed citations

16.

Butterly, Lynn F., Christina M. Robinson, Joseph C. Anderson, et al.. (2014). Serrated and Adenomatous Polyp Detection Increases With Longer Withdrawal Time: Results From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 109(3). 417–426. 161 indexed citations

17.

Anderson, Joseph C., Catherine R. Messina, Biju Abraham, et al.. (2007). Body Mass Index. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 41(3). 285–290. 51 indexed citations

18.

Anderson, Joseph C., Zvi Alpern, Catherine R. Messina, et al.. (2005). Prevalence and Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia in Consumers of Alcohol in a Screening Population. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 100(9). 2049–2055. 56 indexed citations

19.

Wang, Zigang, Lihong Li, Joseph C. Anderson, Donald P. Harrington, & Zhengrong Liang. (2004). Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of colon polyps with morphological and texture features. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 5370. 972–972. 17 indexed citations

20.

Anderson, Joseph C., et al.. (1977). The use of the Zickel device for a malunited subtrochanteric femur fracture.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 69(9). 623–4. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact