Tim Riley

31 papers receiving 200 citations

Peers

Tim Riley
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 60
  • Geometry and Topology 101
  • Mathematical Physics 55
  • Paleontology 28
  • Archeology 4
Replace Thomas M. Lewis with:
Thomas M. Lewis United States
Theodore Stanford United States
Efstratia Kalfagianni United States
Wolfgang Metzler Germany
Elias Saab United States
Alina Vdovina United Kingdom
Amit Khetan United States
Sergei Chmutov United States
Lingmin Liao China
Tim Austin United States
Tim Riley relative to Thomas M. Lewis United States Thomas M. Lewis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Thomas M. Lewis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tim Riley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Riley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Riley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Riley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Riley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Riley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Riley. The network helps show where Tim Riley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Tim Riley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tim Riley Line = papers co-authored together Tim Riley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200823
2 201123
3 200618
4 200216
5 200316
6 200715
7 200312
8 200510
9
Beautiful Testing: Leading Professionals Reveal How They Improve Software
20097
10 20057
11 20157
12 20056
13 20066
14 20066
15 20145
16 20135
17 20024
18 19873
19 20013
20
The Dehn function of Stallings' group
20092

About Tim Riley

Tim Riley is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mathematical Physics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 34 papers that have together received 209 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geometric and Algebraic Topology (19 papers), semigroups and automata theory (8 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (7 papers), Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics (7 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (4 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (3 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (2 papers) and Topological and Geometric Data Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (60 citations), Geometry and Topology (101 citations), Mathematical Physics (55 citations), Paleontology (28 citations) and Archeology (4 citations). Tim Riley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include William P. Thurston, Sean Cleary, Noel Brady, Derek F. Holt, Hamish Short, S. M. Gersten, Martin Kassabov, David Reid, Martin R. Bridson and Robert M. Young. Their work appears in journals such as Geometriae Dedicata, Journal of Archaeological Science, International Journal of Algebra and Computation, The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics and Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact