Tim Klaus

733 total citations
27 papers, 486 citations indexed

About

Tim Klaus is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Management Information Systems and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Tim Klaus has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 486 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Information Systems and Management, 9 papers in Management Information Systems and 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Tim Klaus's work include Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (13 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (7 papers) and Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (6 papers). Tim Klaus is often cited by papers focused on Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (13 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (7 papers) and Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (6 papers). Tim Klaus collaborates with scholars based in United States, Thailand and New Zealand. Tim Klaus's co-authors include J. Ellis Blanton, Chuleeporn Changchit, Stephen C. Wingreen, H. Joseph Wen, Cynthia LeRouge, Michael L. Harris, Long Pham and Pruthikrai Mahatanankoon and has published in prestigious journals such as Communications of the ACM, Journal of the Association for Information Systems and Acta Psychologica.

In The Last Decade

Tim Klaus

25 papers receiving 441 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Tim Klaus United States	11	159	157	150	93	73	27	486
Akhilesh Bajaj United States	11	204 1.3×	123 0.8×	150 1.0×	139 1.5×	77 1.1×	45	528
Angela Lin United Kingdom	9	225 1.4×	211 1.3×	149 1.0×	176 1.9×	55 0.8×	28	650
Dawn Jutla Canada	12	195 1.2×	153 1.0×	177 1.2×	122 1.3×	98 1.3×	61	668
Elaine Ferneley United Kingdom	10	118 0.7×	116 0.7×	145 1.0×	158 1.7×	32 0.4×	32	564
Deng‐Neng Chen Taiwan	9	108 0.7×	140 0.9×	131 0.9×	49 0.5×	36 0.5×	24	479
Duy Dang-Pham Vietnam	13	122 0.8×	279 1.8×	198 1.3×	58 0.6×	89 1.2×	39	543
Vlad Krotov United States	13	110 0.7×	141 0.9×	87 0.6×	231 2.5×	60 0.8×	29	580
Ulrike Lechner Germany	13	82 0.5×	176 1.1×	138 0.9×	144 1.5×	69 0.9×	82	628
Aaron M. French United States	14	117 0.7×	130 0.8×	224 1.5×	55 0.6×	44 0.6×	47	509
Ai‐Mei Chang United States	10	170 1.1×	73 0.5×	184 1.2×	79 0.8×	40 0.5×	22	452

Countries citing papers authored by Tim Klaus

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Klaus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Klaus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Klaus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Klaus

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Klaus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Klaus. The network helps show where Tim Klaus may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tim Klaus

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tim Klaus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tim Klaus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tim Klaus. Tim Klaus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Pham, Long, et al.. (2025). Key factors influencing intention to use ChatGPT: An empirical study of U.S. students. Acta Psychologica. 260. 105516–105516.

Pham, Long, Tim Klaus, & Chuleeporn Changchit. (2023). Factors Influencing Intention to Use Online Consumer Reviews. Journal of Global Information Management. 31(1). 1–22. 7 indexed citations

Wingreen, Stephen C., et al.. (2021). Motivation to Participate in Professional Development in Technologically Intensive Work Environments. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 49(1). 535–555. 2 indexed citations

Klaus, Tim & Chuleeporn Changchit. (2020). Sandbox Environments in an ERP System Context: Examining User Attitude and Satisfaction. 23(1). 5 indexed citations

Changchit, Chuleeporn, et al.. (2020). A Comparative Study of Trust in Mobile Banking. Journal of Global Information Management. 28(4). 95–119. 14 indexed citations

Klaus, Tim, et al.. (2020). The impact of data breaches on corporations and the status of potential regulation and litigation. Law and Financial Markets Review. 14(4). 255–260. 2 indexed citations

Changchit, Chuleeporn & Tim Klaus. (2019). Determinants and Impact of Online Reviews on Product Satisfaction. Journal of Internet Commerce. 19(1). 82–102. 30 indexed citations

Klaus, Tim, et al.. (2017). The market impact of high-frequency trading systems and potential regulation. Law and Financial Markets Review. 11(1). 13–19. 1 indexed citations

Klaus, Tim, J. Ellis Blanton, & Stephen C. Wingreen. (2015). User Resistance Behaviors and Management Strategies in IT-Enabled Change. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing. 27(1). 57–76. 12 indexed citations

10.

Changchit, Chuleeporn & Tim Klaus. (2012). Technological improvements on classroom community and the increasing acceptance of distance learning courses. International Journal of Innovation and Learning. 11(4). 404–404. 1 indexed citations

11.

Klaus, Tim. (2011). Understanding User Dissatisfaction. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing. 23(3). 1–25. 1 indexed citations

12.

Klaus, Tim, Stephen C. Wingreen, & J. Ellis Blanton. (2010). Resistant Groups in Enterprise System Implementations: A Q-Methodology Examination. Journal of Information Technology. 25(1). 91–106. 44 indexed citations

13.

Klaus, Tim & J. Ellis Blanton. (2010). User resistance determinants and the psychological contract in enterprise system implementations. European Journal of Information Systems. 19(6). 625–636. 90 indexed citations

14.

Klaus, Tim & Chuleeporn Changchit. (2009). Online or Traditional. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education. 5(3). 14–23. 2 indexed citations

15.

Klaus, Tim. (2008). Security Metrics - Replacing Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt. Journal of Information Privacy and Security. 4(2). 62–63. 138 indexed citations

16.

Mahatanankoon, Pruthikrai, Tim Klaus, & H. Joseph Wen. (2007). An Examination of Internet Effectiveness for Non-work Activities. Journal of international technology and information management. 16(3). 2. 6 indexed citations

17.

Klaus, Tim, et al.. (2007). Online versus Traditional Classroom Environments: An Exploratory Study of Course Characteristics. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 451. 1 indexed citations

18.

Klaus, Tim, Stephen C. Wingreen, & J. Ellis Blanton. (2007). Examining user resistance and management strategies in enterprise system implementations. 55–62. 15 indexed citations

19.

Harris, Michael L., et al.. (2007). The whitewater process. Communications of the ACM. 50(5). 89–93. 9 indexed citations

20.

Klaus, Tim, et al.. (2003). The use of Web-based information systems for non-work activities: An empirical study. Human Systems Management. 22(3). 105–114. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact