Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Driver distraction: The effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance
2005511 citationsTim Horberry, Janet Anderson et al.Accident Analysis & Preventionprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Horberry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Horberry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Horberry more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Horberry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Horberry. The network helps show where Tim Horberry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tim Horberry
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tim Horberry.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tim Horberry based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Tim Horberry. Tim Horberry is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ward, James, et al.. (2016). Guidewire Retention after Central Venous Catheterisation: Prevention and Mitigation using Bow-Tie Analysis. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.2 indexed citations
5.
Horberry, Tim, et al.. (2015). Using the critical decision method and decision ladders to analyse traffic incident management system issues. 1–11.1 indexed citations
Horberry, Tim, et al.. (2014). A user-centred safe design approach to control. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 2(12). 1–25.2 indexed citations
Horberry, Tim, et al.. (2007). Development of an Occlusion Protocol with Design Limits for Assessing Driver Visual Demand.4 indexed citations
12.
Hosking, Simon G., et al.. (2006). Do amber flashers make pedestrians safer. 1–18.1 indexed citations
13.
Horberry, Tim, Ajith Gunatilaka, & Michael Regan. (2006). Intelligent transport systems for industrial mobile equipment safety. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 22(4). 323–334.5 indexed citations
14.
Horberry, Tim, et al.. (2006). HARMONISATION OF ROAD SIGNS AND MARKINGS ON THE TRANS- EUROPEAN ROAD NETWORK TO IMPROVE ROAD SAFETY IN THE EU.5 indexed citations
15.
Horberry, Tim, Janet Anderson, Michael Regan, Thomas J Triggs, & John M. Brown. (2005). Driver distraction: The effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 38(1). 185–191.511 indexed citations breakdown →
Regan, Michael, Kristie L. Young, Thomas J Triggs, et al.. (2004). Intelligent vehicle safety research at the Monash University Accident Research Centre. Transport Research Forum. 27. 1–11.1 indexed citations
18.
Horberry, Tim, et al.. (2003). INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTS OF DRIVER DISTRACTION. 7(2). 97–105.3 indexed citations
Castro, Cándida, Tim Horberry, & Alastair G. Gale. (2001). THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT SPEEDOMETER DISPLAY TYPES WITH RESPECT TO READING NUMERICAL INFORMATION AND DETECTING SPEED CHANGE.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.