Tim Groot Kormelink

1.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
21 papers, 636 citations indexed

About

Tim Groot Kormelink is a scholar working on Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Literature and Literary Theory. According to data from OpenAlex, Tim Groot Kormelink has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 636 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Communication, 10 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 5 papers in Literature and Literary Theory. Recurrent topics in Tim Groot Kormelink's work include Media Studies and Communication (14 papers), Social Media and Politics (7 papers) and Media Influence and Health (4 papers). Tim Groot Kormelink is often cited by papers focused on Media Studies and Communication (14 papers), Social Media and Politics (7 papers) and Media Influence and Health (4 papers). Tim Groot Kormelink collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Russia and Spain. Tim Groot Kormelink's co-authors include Irene Costera Meijer, Marcel Broersma, Joëlle Swart, Bella Struminskaya, Enrico Santangelo, Kasper Welbers, Frank J. Blaauw, Laura Boeschoten, Judith Moeller and Philipp K. Masur and has published in prestigious journals such as Information Communication & Society, Media Culture & Society and Digital Journalism.

In The Last Decade

Tim Groot Kormelink

17 papers receiving 612 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Advancing a Radical Audience Turn in Journalism. Fundamental Dilemmas for Journalism Studies

2022 64 citations Joëlle Swart, Tim Groot Kormelink et al. Digital Journalism profile →

Peers

Tim Groot Kormelink

COMMU

SPS

LLT

SNP

PHILO

Angela M. Lee United States

Ike Picone Belgium

Víctor García‐Perdomo Colombia

Mora Matassi Argentina

Benjamin Toff United States

Cornelia Mothes United States

Antonis Kalogeropoulos United Kingdom

Melissa Wall United States

Morten Skovsgaard Denmark

Marcus Maurer Germany

Angela M. Lee United States

Tim Groot Kormelink

411 ×0.8

COMMU

377 ×1.0

SPS

58 ×0.7

LLT

30 ×0.8

SNP

10 ×0.3

PHILO

Citations per year, relative to Tim Groot Kormelink Tim Groot Kormelink (= 1×) peers Angela M. Lee

Countries citing papers authored by Tim Groot Kormelink

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Groot Kormelink's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Groot Kormelink with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Groot Kormelink more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Groot Kormelink

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Groot Kormelink. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Groot Kormelink. The network helps show where Tim Groot Kormelink may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tim Groot Kormelink

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tim Groot Kormelink. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tim Groot Kormelink based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tim Groot Kormelink. Tim Groot Kormelink is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Meijer, Irene Costera, et al.. (2026). The User Experience of TikTok and Its Compatibility with News. Digital Journalism. 1–21.

2.

Kormelink, Tim Groot, et al.. (2025). Meaningful informed consent? How participants experience and understand data donation. Information Communication & Society. 1–18.

3.

Kormelink, Tim Groot, et al.. (2025). Anytime, Anyplace? The Context-Dependency of News Podcast Use. Journalism Studies. 26(8). 961–979.

4.

Kormelink, Tim Groot, et al.. (2024). Nudging News Readers: A Mixed-Methods Approach to Understanding When and How Interface Nudges Affect News Selection. Digital Journalism. 13(9). 1647–1667. 2 indexed citations

5.

Swart, Joëlle, Tim Groot Kormelink, Irene Costera Meijer, & Marcel Broersma. (2022). Advancing a Radical Audience Turn in Journalism. Fundamental Dilemmas for Journalism Studies. Digital Journalism. 10(1). 8–22. 64 indexed citations breakdown →

6.

Kormelink, Tim Groot. (2022). How People Integrate News into Their Everyday Routines: A Context-Centered Approach to News Habits. Digital Journalism. 11(1). 19–38. 8 indexed citations

7.

Kormelink, Tim Groot, et al.. (2021). From “Far Away” to “Shock” to “Fatigue” to “Back to Normal”: How Young People Experienced News During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journalism Studies. 23(5-6). 669–686. 42 indexed citations

8.

Kormelink, Tim Groot. (2020). Seeing, Thinking, Feeling: A Critical Reflection on Interview-based Methods for Studying News Use. Journalism Studies. 21(7). 863–878. 22 indexed citations

9.

Meijer, Irene Costera & Tim Groot Kormelink. (2020). Changing News Use. Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam). 11 indexed citations

10.

Meijer, Irene Costera & Tim Groot Kormelink. (2020). Changing News Use: Unchanged News Experiences?. 13 indexed citations

11.

Kormelink, Tim Groot. (2019). Capturing and making sense of everyday news use. 5 indexed citations

12.

Kormelink, Tim Groot & Irene Costera Meijer. (2019). A User Perspective on Time Spent: Temporal Experiences of Everyday News Use. Journalism Studies. 21(2). 271–286. 39 indexed citations

13.

Kormelink, Tim Groot & Irene Costera Meijer. (2019). Material and sensory dimensions of everyday news use. Media Culture & Society. 41(5). 637–653. 24 indexed citations

14.

Kormelink, Tim Groot & Irene Costera Meijer. (2017). “It’s Catchy, but It Gets You F*cking Nowhere”. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 22(2). 143–162. 12 indexed citations

15.

Kormelink, Tim Groot & Irene Costera Meijer. (2017). What clicks actually mean: Exploring digital news user practices. Journalism. 19(5). 668–683. 93 indexed citations

16.

Meijer, Irene Costera & Tim Groot Kormelink. (2015). Clicken, checken, delen, snacken, linken: Veranderend gebruik van journalistiek, 2004 – 2014. 289–307. 1 indexed citations

17.

Kormelink, Tim Groot & Irene Costera Meijer. (2015). Truthful or Engaging?. Digital Journalism. 3(2). 158–174. 26 indexed citations

18.

Kormelink, Tim Groot, et al.. (2015). Engaging Politics: How news users experience and value different narrative forms in current affairs TV.

19.

Kormelink, Tim Groot & Irene Costera Meijer. (2014). Tailor-Made News. Journalism Studies. 15(5). 632–641. 46 indexed citations

20.

Meijer, Irene Costera & Tim Groot Kormelink. (2014). Checking, Sharing, Clicking and Linking. Digital Journalism. 3(5). 664–679. 208 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact