Joëlle Swart
- Communication top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Education top 10%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- Marcel BroersmaChris PetersIrene Costera MeijerTim Groot KormelinkJian LinPille Pruulmann-VengerfeldtKristin Van Damme
- Topics
- Social Media and Politics (18 papers)Media Studies and Communication (11 papers)Child Development and Digital Technology (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsDenmarkSweden
In The Last Decade
Joëlle Swart
22 papers receiving 730 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Communication 493
- Sociology and Political Science 457
- Education 77
- Literature and Literary Theory 63
- Artificial Intelligence 63
Countries citing papers authored by Joëlle Swart
This map shows the geographic impact of Joëlle Swart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joëlle Swart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joëlle Swart more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joëlle Swart
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joëlle Swart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joëlle Swart. The network helps show where Joëlle Swart may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joëlle Swart
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joëlle Swart. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joëlle Swart based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joëlle Swart. Joëlle Swart is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | Advancing a Radical Audience Turn in Journalism. Fundamental Dilemmas for Journalism Studiesbreakdown → | 64 |
| 13 | 43 | |
| 14 | 37 | |
| 15 | Experiencing Algorithms: How Young People Understand, Feel About, and Engage With Algorithmic News Selection on Social Mediabreakdown → | 199 |
| 16 | 62 | |
| 17 | 77 | |
| 18 | Cross-medial news usage in the Dutch-language region : A comparative study of news repertoires in the Netherlands and Flanders | 1 |
| 19 | 49 | |
| 20 | Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2015 | 1 |
About Joëlle Swart
Joëlle Swart is a scholar working on Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 26 papers that have together received 772 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media and Politics (18 papers), Media Studies and Communication (11 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (493 citations), Sociology and Political Science (457 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (42 citations). Joëlle Swart has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Denmark and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Marcel Broersma, Chris Peters, Irene Costera Meijer, Tim Groot Kormelink, Jian Lin, Pille Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt and Kristin Van Damme. Their work appears in journals such as New Media & Society, Media Culture & Society and Digital Journalism.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.