Tim Draws

2.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
19 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Tim Draws is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Artificial Intelligence and Safety Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Tim Draws has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 5 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 4 papers in Safety Research. Recurrent topics in Tim Draws's work include Misinformation and Its Impacts (4 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (4 papers) and Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (4 papers). Tim Draws is often cited by papers focused on Misinformation and Its Impacts (4 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (4 papers) and Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (4 papers). Tim Draws collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Switzerland. Tim Draws's co-authors include Fabian Dablander, Don van den Bergh, Jan G. Voelkel, Johnny van Doorn, Max Hinne, Koen Derks, Alexander Ly, Alexandra Sarafoglou, Angelika Marlene Stefan and Šimon Kucharský and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction and ACM Transactions on the Web.

In The Last Decade

Tim Draws

19 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesi... 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tim Draws Netherlands 10 471 208 169 150 149 19 1.1k
Alexandra Sarafoglou Netherlands 12 534 1.1× 263 1.3× 181 1.1× 96 0.6× 114 0.8× 29 1.3k
Andreja Bubić Croatia 16 625 1.3× 349 1.7× 249 1.5× 118 0.8× 86 0.6× 60 1.2k
Wolfgang Wagner Germany 20 329 0.7× 206 1.0× 254 1.5× 120 0.8× 73 0.5× 58 1.3k
Max Hinne Netherlands 13 701 1.5× 341 1.6× 187 1.1× 79 0.5× 110 0.7× 34 1.5k
Jan G. Voelkel United States 13 535 1.1× 214 1.0× 243 1.4× 298 2.0× 73 0.5× 26 1.3k
Don van den Bergh Netherlands 12 579 1.2× 293 1.4× 218 1.3× 106 0.7× 82 0.6× 24 1.4k
Alexander Etz United States 15 623 1.3× 466 2.2× 311 1.8× 202 1.3× 178 1.2× 27 1.9k
Joshua R. de Leeuw United States 11 729 1.5× 440 2.1× 248 1.5× 94 0.6× 178 1.2× 19 1.5k
Angelika Marlene Stefan Netherlands 11 559 1.2× 259 1.2× 185 1.1× 66 0.4× 86 0.6× 23 1.3k
Jonathon Love Netherlands 10 878 1.9× 441 2.1× 306 1.8× 150 1.0× 154 1.0× 14 2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Tim Draws

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Draws's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Draws with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Draws more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Draws

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Draws. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Draws. The network helps show where Tim Draws may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tim Draws

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tim Draws. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tim Draws based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tim Draws. Tim Draws is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Draws, Tim, et al.. (2023). Disentangling Fairness Perceptions in Algorithmic Decision-Making: the Effects of Explanations, Human Oversight, and Contestability. Research Publications (Maastricht University). 1–21. 34 indexed citations
2.
Draws, Tim, et al.. (2023). Evaluating explainable social choice-based aggregation strategies for group recommendation. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. 34(1). 1–58. 4 indexed citations
3.
Draws, Tim, et al.. (2023). Nudges to Mitigate Confirmation Bias during Web Search on Debated Topics: Support vs. Manipulation. ACM Transactions on the Web. 18(2). 1–27. 5 indexed citations
4.
Draws, Tim, et al.. (2023). Explainable Cross-Topic Stance Detection for Search Results. Research Publications (Maastricht University). 221–235. 6 indexed citations
5.
Inel, Oana, Tim Draws, & Lora Aroyo. (2023). Collect, Measure, Repeat: Reliability Factors for Responsible AI Data Collection. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing. 11(1). 51–64. 5 indexed citations
6.
Draws, Tim, et al.. (2023). Investigating the Influence of Featured Snippets on User Attitudes. Research Repository (Delft University of Technology). 211–220. 3 indexed citations
7.
Draws, Tim, et al.. (2022). The Effects of Crowd Worker Biases in Fact-Checking Tasks. Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI), the national research institute for mathematics and computer science in the Netherlands. 2114–2124. 12 indexed citations
8.
Draws, Tim, et al.. (2022). Comprehensive Viewpoint Representations for a Deeper Understanding of User Interactions With Debated Topics. Research Publications (Maastricht University). 135–145. 16 indexed citations
9.
Giunchiglia, Fausto, Styliani Kleanthous, Jahna Otterbacher, & Tim Draws. (2021). Transparency Paths - Documenting the Diversity of User Perceptions. Research Repository (Delft University of Technology). 415–420. 1 indexed citations
10.
Draws, Tim, et al.. (2021). Exploring User Concerns about Disclosing Location and Emotion Information in Group Recommendations. Research Publications (Maastricht University). 155–164. 7 indexed citations
11.
Draws, Tim, et al.. (2021). A Checklist to Combat Cognitive Biases in Crowdsourcing. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing. 9. 48–59. 54 indexed citations
12.
Draws, Tim, et al.. (2021). Toward Benchmarking Group Explanations: Evaluating the Effect of Aggregation Strategies versus Explanation. Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich). 3 indexed citations
13.
Draws, Tim, et al.. (2021). This Item Might Reinforce Your Opinion: Obfuscation and Labeling of Search Results to Mitigate Confirmation Bias. Research Publications (Maastricht University). 189–199. 29 indexed citations
14.
Draws, Tim, Nava Tintarev, & Ujwal Gadiraju. (2021). Assessing Viewpoint Diversity in Search Results Using Ranking Fairness Metrics. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter. 23(1). 50–58. 17 indexed citations
15.
Draws, Tim. (2021). Understanding How Algorithmic and Cognitive Biases in Web Search Affect User Attitudes on Debated Topics. Research Repository (Delft University of Technology). 2709–2709. 1 indexed citations
16.
Draws, Tim, et al.. (2021). This Is Not What We Ordered: Exploring Why Biased Search Result Rankings Affect User Attitudes on Debated Topics. Research Publications (Maastricht University). 295–305. 19 indexed citations
17.
Doorn, Johnny van, Don van den Bergh, Fabian Dablander, et al.. (2020). The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 28(3). 813–826. 652 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Bergh, Don van den, Johnny van Doorn, Maarten Marsman, et al.. (2020). A Tutorial on Conducting and Interpreting a Bayesian ANOVA in JASP. L’Année psychologique. Vol. 120(1). 73–96. 181 indexed citations
19.
Bergh, Don van den, Johnny van Doorn, Maarten Marsman, et al.. (2019). A Tutorial on Conducting and Interpreting a Bayesian ANOVA in JASP. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 82 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026