Tilo Moede
Impact in
- Surgery top 2%
- Pancreatic function and diabetes
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Cellular transport and secretion
Papers in
- Surgery 29
- Pancreatic function and diabetes 29
-
- Cell Adhesion Molecules Research 1
- Co-authors
- Per‐Olof Berggren (31 shared papers)Ingo B. Leibiger (30 shared papers)Barbara Leibiger (25 shared papers)Martin G. Köhler (8 shared papers)Sabine Uhles (5 shared papers)Lina Moitoso de Vargas (1 shared paper)C. Ronald Kahn (1 shared paper)Rohit Kulkarni (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The FASEB Journal (4 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (4 papers)Biochemical Society Transactions (2 papers)Diabetologia (2 papers)Molecular Cell (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwedenUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Tilo Moede
35 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Tilo Moede's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Surgery 1.0k
- Cell Biology 87
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 104
- Molecular Biology 246
- Epidemiology 113
Countries citing papers authored by Tilo Moede
This map shows the geographic impact of Tilo Moede's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tilo Moede with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tilo Moede more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tilo Moede
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tilo Moede. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tilo Moede. The network helps show where Tilo Moede may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tilo Moede, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adipsin Is an Adipokine that Improves β Cell Function in Diabetes Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 318 |
| 2 | 1998 | 240 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 229 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 223 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 123 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 100 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 100 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 99 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 89 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 87 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 86 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 83 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 77 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 70 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 48 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 42 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 41 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 37 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 33 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 31 |
About Tilo Moede
Tilo Moede is a scholar working on Surgery, Immunology and Allergy, Epidemiology, Nuclear Energy and Engineering and Waste Management and Disposal, having authored 36 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic function and diabetes (29 papers), Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (1 paper) and Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (1.0k citations), Cell Biology (87 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (104 citations), Molecular Biology (246 citations) and Epidemiology (113 citations). Tilo Moede has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Per‐Olof Berggren, Ingo B. Leibiger, Barbara Leibiger, Martin G. Köhler, Sabine Uhles, Lina Moitoso de Vargas, C. Ronald Kahn, Rohit Kulkarni, Sanda Ljubicic and Robert Bränström. Their work appears in journals such as The FASEB Journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Biochemical Society Transactions, Diabetologia and Molecular Cell.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.