Tihamér Z. Csáky
-
- Gastrointestinal motility and disorders 1
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Tihamér Z. Csáky
2 papers receiving 75 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Pharmaceutical Science 21
- Nutrition and Dietetics 15
- Gastroenterology 5
- Oncology 22
- Pharmacology 6
Countries citing papers authored by Tihamér Z. Csáky
This map shows the geographic impact of Tihamér Z. Csáky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tihamér Z. Csáky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tihamér Z. Csáky more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tihamér Z. Csáky
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tihamér Z. Csáky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tihamér Z. Csáky. The network helps show where Tihamér Z. Csáky may publish in the future.
No co-authors to show.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1984 | 49 | |
| 2 | 1984 | 28 |
About Tihamér Z. Csáky
Tihamér Z. Csáky is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 2 papers that have together received 77 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (21 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (15 citations) and Gastroenterology (5 citations). Tihamér Z. Csáky has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Their work appears in journals such as Handbook of experimental pharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.