Tien‐Chun Yang
About
In The Last Decade
Tien‐Chun Yang
10 papers receiving 356 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Molecular Biology 225
- Biomedical Engineering 76
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 67
- Materials Chemistry 58
- Biomaterials 44
Countries citing papers authored by Tien‐Chun Yang
This map shows the geographic impact of Tien‐Chun Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tien‐Chun Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tien‐Chun Yang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tien‐Chun Yang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tien‐Chun Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tien‐Chun Yang. The network helps show where Tien‐Chun Yang may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tien‐Chun Yang
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tien‐Chun Yang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tien‐Chun Yang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tien‐Chun Yang. Tien‐Chun Yang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 95 | |
| 5 | 32 | |
| 6 | 75 | |
| 7 | 55 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 36 | |
| 10 | 35 | |
| 11 | 18 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.