Thomas White
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Pharmacology
- Biological Psychiatry top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Sukhwinder S. ShergillDerek K. TracyCaroline CaddyGiovanni GiaroliRebekah WigtonDan W. JoyceJames GilleenTracy Collier
- Topics
- Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (6 papers)Geographies of human-animal interactions (4 papers)China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Thomas White
16 papers receiving 315 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Cognitive Neuroscience 147
- Psychiatry and Mental health 98
- Pharmacology 81
- Biological Psychiatry 71
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 62
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas White
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas White's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas White with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas White more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas White
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas White. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas White. The network helps show where Thomas White may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas White
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas White. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas White based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas White. Thomas White is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 50 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 31 | |
| 13 | 32 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 28 | |
| 16 | 103 | |
| 17 | Lost at Sea: Rescuing Cruise Line Crewmembers From the Perils of Foreign Arbitration | 0 |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | Neanderthals Chasing Bigfoot? The State of the Gender Debate in the Southern Baptist Convention | 0 |
About Thomas White
Thomas White is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 19 papers that have together received 321 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (6 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (4 papers) and China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (71 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (147 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (98 citations). Thomas White has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Sukhwinder S. Shergill, Derek K. Tracy, Caroline Caddy, Giovanni Giaroli, Rebekah Wigton, Dan W. Joyce, James Gilleen, Tracy Collier, Alex Fornito and Faith Borgan. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Medicine, Neuropsychopharmacology and Frontiers in Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.