Thomas W. H. Oates

41 papers receiving 965 citations

Peers

Thomas W. H. Oates
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 442
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 130
  • Computational Mechanics 240
  • Biomedical Engineering 423
  • Materials Chemistry 413
Replace S. Camelio with:
S. Camelio France
M. Kandyla Greece
Jingya Sun China
N. Rochat France
A. J. Pidduck United Kingdom
M. A. Paesler United States
Claudia Fleischmann Belgium
W. J. Gunning United States
Mufei Xiao Mexico
E. Kinsbron Israel
Thomas W. H. Oates relative to S. Camelio France S. Camelio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
S. Camelio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas W. H. Oates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas W. H. Oates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas W. H. Oates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas W. H. Oates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas W. H. Oates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas W. H. Oates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas W. H. Oates. The network helps show where Thomas W. H. Oates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas W. H. Oates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas W. H. Oates Line = papers co-authored together Thomas W. H. Oates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200796
2 200594
3 200865
4 201165
5 201062
6 200349
7 201643
8 200939
9 200938
10 200834
11 200434
12 200633
13 200527
14 200321
15 201320
16 200219
17 200219
18 201018
19 200217
20 200517

About Thomas W. H. Oates

Thomas W. H. Oates is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (13 papers), Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research (13 papers), Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications (12 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (10 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (9 papers), Vacuum and Plasma Arcs (6 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (5 papers) and Photonic Crystals and Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (442 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (130 citations), Computational Mechanics (240 citations), Biomedical Engineering (423 citations) and Materials Chemistry (413 citations). Thomas W. H. Oates has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Facsko, A. Mücklich, Marcela Bilek, David R. McKenzie, Adrian Keller, Mukesh Ranjan, Suguru Noda, Karsten Hinrichs, Hans Arwin and Eungsun Byon. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Express, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, Thin Solid Films, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science and Applied Physics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact