Thomas Swerts
Impact in
- Urban Studies top 10%
- Urban Planning and Governance
Papers in
-
- Migration, Refugees, and Integration 9
- Migration and Labor Dynamics 3
- Political Conflict and Governance 2
- Sex work and related issues 1
-
- Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography 2
- Co-authors
- Walter J. Nicholls (1 shared paper)Stijn Oosterlynck (2 shared papers)Arjen Leerkes (1 shared paper)Jeremy Waddington (1 shared paper)Valeria Pulignano (1 shared paper)Joke Vandenabeele (1 shared paper)Marc Jans (1 shared paper)Nick Schuermans (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Antipode (2 papers)Urban Planning (1 paper)Global Networks (1 paper)International Journal of Urban and Regional Research (1 paper)Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsBelgiumUnited States
In The Last Decade
Thomas Swerts
12 papers receiving 156 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Urban Studies 18
- Public Administration 10
- Sociology and Political Science 119
- Clinical Psychology 37
- Political Science and International Relations 35
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Swerts
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Swerts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Swerts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Swerts more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Swerts
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Swerts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Swerts. The network helps show where Thomas Swerts may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Swerts, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 51 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 30 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 23 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 0 | |
| 14 | 2026 | 0 | |
| 15 | Omgaan met etnisch-culturele diversiteit in het middenveld: een overzicht van de paradigma’s | 2019 | 0 |
About Thomas Swerts
Thomas Swerts is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Education, having authored 15 papers that have together received 161 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Refugees, and Integration (9 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (4 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (3 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (3 papers), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (2 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (2 papers), Sex work and related issues (1 paper) and Taxation and Legal Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (18 citations), Public Administration (10 citations), Sociology and Political Science (119 citations), Clinical Psychology (37 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (35 citations). Thomas Swerts has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Walter J. Nicholls, Stijn Oosterlynck, Arjen Leerkes, Jeremy Waddington, Valeria Pulignano, Joke Vandenabeele, Marc Jans and Nick Schuermans. Their work appears in journals such as Antipode, Urban Planning, Global Networks, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research and Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.