Thomas Strandberg

415 total citations
8 papers, 217 citations indexed

About

Thomas Strandberg is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Strandberg has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 217 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 3 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in Thomas Strandberg's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers) and Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (3 papers). Thomas Strandberg is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers) and Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (3 papers). Thomas Strandberg collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Canada and United Kingdom. Thomas Strandberg's co-authors include Lars Häll, Petter Johansson, Philip Pärnamets, Andreas Lind, Betty Tärning, Jay A. Olson, Andy Woods, Amir Raz, Mirta Galešić and Wändi Bruine de Bruin and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Experimental Psychology General and Consciousness and Cognition.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Strandberg

7 papers receiving 208 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas Strandberg Sweden	6	116	76	55	32	26	8	217
Philipp Koralus United Kingdom	7	122 1.1×	45 0.6×	74 1.3×	18 0.6×	29 1.1×	14	219
Jordan Taylor United States	6	93 0.8×	58 0.8×	32 0.6×	11 0.3×	25 1.0×	12	182
Trevor Kvaran United States	6	141 1.2×	37 0.5×	45 0.8×	14 0.4×	33 1.3×	10	189
Jason Shepard United States	6	221 1.9×	77 1.0×	56 1.0×	20 0.6×	38 1.5×	15	274
Marlène Abadie France	10	160 1.4×	25 0.3×	62 1.1×	57 1.8×	14 0.5×	25	268
Walter C. Sá United States	4	44 0.4×	34 0.4×	44 0.8×	67 2.1×	17 0.7×	4	260
Christine L. Ruva United States	9	84 0.7×	81 1.1×	105 1.9×	15 0.5×	2 0.1×	19	242
Shawn A Rhoads United States	10	110 0.9×	52 0.7×	83 1.5×	16 0.5×	8 0.3×	18	222
Cláudia Simão Portugal	8	56 0.5×	126 1.7×	95 1.7×	6 0.2×	4 0.2×	23	238
Jeroen M. van Baar United States	7	122 1.1×	70 0.9×	57 1.0×	9 0.3×	2 0.1×	10	206

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Strandberg

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Strandberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Strandberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Strandberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Strandberg

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Strandberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Strandberg. The network helps show where Thomas Strandberg may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Strandberg

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Strandberg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Strandberg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Strandberg. Thomas Strandberg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

McKay, Ryan, et al.. (2025). “I once was blind”: experimental manipulation of religious attitudes via choice blindness. Religion Brain & Behavior. 1–18.

2.

Bruin, Wändi Bruine de, Mirta Galešić, Rasmus Bååth, et al.. (2022). Asking about Social Circles Improves Election Predictions Even with Many Political Parties. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 34(1). 5 indexed citations

3.

Olson, Jay A., et al.. (2022). Emulating future neurotechnology using magic. Consciousness and Cognition. 107. 103450–103450. 5 indexed citations

4.

Strandberg, Thomas, Jay A. Olson, Lars Häll, Andy Woods, & Petter Johansson. (2020). Depolarizing American voters: Democrats and Republicans are equally susceptible to false attitude feedback. PLoS ONE. 15(2). e0226799–e0226799. 11 indexed citations

5.

Strandberg, Thomas, et al.. (2018). False beliefs and confabulation can lead to lasting changes in political attitudes.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 147(9). 1382–1399. 24 indexed citations

6.

Häll, Lars, Thomas Strandberg, Philip Pärnamets, et al.. (2013). How the Polls Can Be Both Spot On and Dead Wrong: Using Choice Blindness to Shift Political Attitudes and Voter Intentions. PLoS ONE. 8(4). e60554–e60554. 61 indexed citations

7.

Häll, Lars, Petter Johansson, & Thomas Strandberg. (2012). Lifting the Veil of Morality: Choice Blindness and Attitude Reversals on a Self-Transforming Survey. PLoS ONE. 7(9). e45457–e45457. 110 indexed citations

8.

Bååth, Rasmus, Thomas Strandberg, & Christian Balkenius. (2011). Eye Tapping: How to Beat Out an Accurate Rhythm using Eye Movements. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 441–444. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact