Thomas S. Selwood

887 citations
14 papers · 670 indexed · h-index 10

Thomas S. Selwood

14 papers receiving 617 citations

Peers

Thomas S. Selwood
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Dermatology 388
  • Epidemiology 408
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 91
  • Oncology 298
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 67
Replace Catherine Mercier with:
Catherine Mercier France
Seema P. Kini United States
Hakan Turan Türkiye
Hakan Kıran Türkiye
Melissa Danesh United States
Brian Calcraft United Kingdom
Kristen Corey United States
Raheleh Shokouhi Shoormasti Iran
J.C. Ruiz‐Carrascosa Spain
Anne Bijon France
Thomas S. Selwood relative to Catherine Mercier France Catherine Mercier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
Catherine Mercier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas S. Selwood

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas S. Selwood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas S. Selwood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas S. Selwood more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas S. Selwood

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas S. Selwood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas S. Selwood. The network helps show where Thomas S. Selwood may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Thomas S. Selwood, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas S. Selwood Line = papers co-authored together Thomas S. Selwood links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1989111
2 1986231
3 19862
4 198533
5 198427
6 198391
7 1983107
8
A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial
19839
9
Factors influencing birth control habits in Victoria.
19813
10 198111
11 198018
12
A follow-up survey of family planning methods in general practice in Victoria.
19805
13 197917
14 19785

About Thomas S. Selwood

Thomas S. Selwood is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Complementary and alternative medicine, Dermatology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Oncology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 670 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (5 papers), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (4 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (3 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (3 papers), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (3 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers), Skin Protection and Aging (2 papers) and Genetic and rare skin diseases. (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (388 citations), Epidemiology (408 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (91 citations), Oncology (298 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (67 citations). Thomas S. Selwood has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Greg Goodman, Robin Marks, Peter Foley, R. Marks, B. Hage, Damien Jolley, A.P. Dorevitch, George Mendelson, Michael Ponsford and David Scott. Their work appears in journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cancer, Australasian Journal of Dermatology and The American Journal of Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026