Thomas S. Matney
- Molecular Biology
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Occupational Therapy top 0.5%
- Genetics top 10%
- Plant Science
- Co-authors
- Jeffrey C. TheissMary Ann ButlerThomas H. ConnorRoger W. AndersonR.K. GholsonMaryce M. JacobsA. Clark GriffinWilliam W. Au
- Topics
- Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (12 papers)Safe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs (10 papers)DNA Repair Mechanisms (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Thomas S. Matney
53 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
- Molecular Biology 602
- Cancer Research 360
- Occupational Therapy 283
- Genetics 204
- Plant Science 168
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas S. Matney
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas S. Matney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas S. Matney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas S. Matney more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas S. Matney
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas S. Matney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas S. Matney. The network helps show where Thomas S. Matney may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas S. Matney
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas S. Matney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas S. Matney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas S. Matney. Thomas S. Matney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 78 | |
| 2 | 38 | |
| 3 | Occupational exposure of nursing personnel to antineoplastic agents. | 24 |
| 4 | 36 | |
| 5 | 39 | |
| 6 | Exposure of pharmacy personnel to mutagenic antineoplastic drugs. | 68 |
| 7 | Comparative structure-genotoxicity study of three aminoanthraquinone drugs and doxorubicin. | 43 |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 64 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 40 | |
| 14 | 26 | |
| 15 | 46 | |
| 16 | 25 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 28 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Thomas S. Matney
Thomas S. Matney is a scholar working on Chemical Health and Safety, Occupational Therapy and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (12 papers), Safe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs (10 papers) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Chemical Health and Safety (145 citations), Occupational Therapy (283 citations) and Cancer Research (360 citations). Thomas S. Matney has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey C. Theiss, Mary Ann Butler, Thomas H. Connor, Roger W. Anderson, R.K. Gholson, Maryce M. Jacobs, A. Clark Griffin, William W. Au, Jana L. Laidlaw and David Monteith. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Genetics and Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.