Stephen E. Bloom

3.9k total citations · 2 hit papers
64 papers, 3.3k citations indexed

About

Stephen E. Bloom is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Cancer Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen E. Bloom has authored 64 papers receiving a total of 3.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Molecular Biology, 20 papers in Plant Science and 19 papers in Cancer Research. Recurrent topics in Stephen E. Bloom's work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (19 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (12 papers) and Animal Genetics and Reproduction (10 papers). Stephen E. Bloom is often cited by papers focused on Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (19 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (12 papers) and Animal Genetics and Reproduction (10 papers). Stephen E. Bloom collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Ghana. Stephen E. Bloom's co-authors include Carll Goodpasture, Andrew D. Kligerman, Donna E. Muscarella, Larry D. Bacon, Joshua W. Hamilton, Ernest Falke, Sheldon Wolff, A.V. Carrano, Raymond R. Tice and Edward L. Schneider and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Journal of Biological Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Stephen E. Bloom

64 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Hit Papers

Visualization of nucleolar organizer regions in mammalian... 1975 2026 1992 2009 1975 1981 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stephen E. Bloom United States 24 1.5k 1.1k 813 713 337 64 3.3k
Nam‐Hyung Kim South Korea 37 2.9k 2.0× 558 0.5× 948 1.2× 395 0.6× 273 0.8× 263 5.5k
Erwin Goldberg United States 39 2.3k 1.5× 227 0.2× 941 1.2× 306 0.4× 104 0.3× 153 4.9k
Е. Д. Свердлов Russia 19 2.5k 1.7× 1.2k 1.1× 697 0.9× 200 0.3× 65 0.2× 71 3.9k
Gabriel Mazzucchelli Belgium 29 1.2k 0.9× 269 0.2× 280 0.3× 398 0.6× 146 0.4× 97 2.7k
Betty Huang United States 19 2.8k 1.9× 798 0.7× 495 0.6× 374 0.5× 66 0.2× 31 4.5k
Zhixing Feng China 9 2.1k 1.5× 1.3k 1.1× 368 0.5× 572 0.8× 78 0.2× 13 3.8k
Marc‐André Sirard Canada 65 4.9k 3.3× 501 0.4× 3.4k 4.2× 525 0.7× 279 0.8× 378 14.5k
Kui Li China 38 2.5k 1.7× 482 0.4× 1.3k 1.7× 1.4k 2.0× 55 0.2× 234 4.8k
Keitaro Kato Japan 34 1.8k 1.2× 134 0.1× 421 0.5× 422 0.6× 76 0.2× 182 3.8k
Michael R. Culbertson United States 44 4.9k 3.3× 714 0.6× 524 0.6× 107 0.2× 113 0.3× 102 6.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen E. Bloom

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen E. Bloom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen E. Bloom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen E. Bloom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen E. Bloom

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen E. Bloom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen E. Bloom. The network helps show where Stephen E. Bloom may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen E. Bloom

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen E. Bloom. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen E. Bloom based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen E. Bloom. Stephen E. Bloom is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
3.
Burton‐Wurster, Nancy, et al.. (2001). Chondrocyte necrosis and apoptosis in impact damaged articular cartilage. Journal of Orthopaedic Research®. 19(4). 703–711. 182 indexed citations
4.
Bloom, Stephen E., et al.. (1998). Cell death in the avian blastoderm: resistance to stress-induced apoptosis and expression of anti-apoptotic genes. Cell Death and Differentiation. 5(6). 529–538. 47 indexed citations
6.
Muscarella, Donna E., et al.. (1998). Expression of cell death regulatory genes and limited apoptosis induction in avian blastodermal cells. Molecular Reproduction and Development. 51(2). 130–142. 13 indexed citations
7.
Hemendinger, Richelle, Marcia M. Miller, & Stephen E. Bloom. (1995). Selective expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigens and modulation of T-cell differentiation in chickens with increased MHC-chromosome dosages. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. 46(3-4). 303–316. 2 indexed citations
8.
Lorr, Nancy A., Jacqueline F. Sinclair, Peter R. Sinclair, & Stephen E. Bloom. (1994). Detection and localization of 3,3′,4,4′-tetrachlorobiphenyl-induced P4501A protein in avian primary immune tissues. International Journal of Immunopharmacology. 16(10). 875–885. 3 indexed citations
9.
Bloom, Stephen E., et al.. (1993). Selective aflatoxin B1‐induced sister chromatid exchanges and cytotoxicity in differentiating B and T lymphocytes in vivo. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis. 21(1). 87–94. 18 indexed citations
10.
Lorr, Nancy A., Karen A. Golemboski, Richelle Hemendinger, Rodney R. Dietert, & Stephen E. Bloom. (1992). Distribution and inducibility of a P450I activity in cellular components of the avian immune system. Archives of Toxicology. 66(8). 560–566. 9 indexed citations
11.
Delany, Mary E., Rodney R. Dietert, & Stephen E. Bloom. (1992). The effects of MHC chromosome dosage on bursal B-cell subpopulations in embryonic and neonatal chickens. Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 16(4). 313–327. 5 indexed citations
12.
Golemboski, Karen A., Stephen E. Bloom, & Rodney R. Dietert. (1992). Assessment of neonatal avian inflammatory macrophage function following embryonic cyclophosphamide exposure. International Journal of Immunopharmacology. 14(1). 19–26. 1 indexed citations
13.
Wilmer, James L., O. Michael Colvin, & Stephen E. Bloom. (1992). Cytogenetic mechanisms in the selective toxicity of cyclophosphamide analogs and metabolites towards avian embryonic B lymphocytes in vivo. Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis. 268(1). 115–130. 21 indexed citations
14.
Hemendinger, Richelle, et al.. (1992). MHC dosage effects on primary immune organ development in the chicken. Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 16(2-3). 175–186. 8 indexed citations
15.
16.
Bloom, Stephen E., et al.. (1989). Toxic effects of methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) on activated macrophages from chickens. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis. 13(3). 253–262. 19 indexed citations
17.
Delany, Mary E., Rodney R. Dietert, & Stephen E. Bloom. (1988). MHC-chromosome dosage effects: evidence for increased expression of Ia glycoprotein and alteration of B cell subpopulations in neonatal aneuploid chickens. Immunogenetics. 27(1). 24–30. 11 indexed citations
18.
Goto, Ronald M., C. Garrett Miyada, Sharon Young, et al.. (1988). Isolation of a cDNA clone from the B-G subregion of the chicken histocompatibility (B) complex. Immunogenetics. 27(2). 102–109. 44 indexed citations
19.
Denison, Michael S., Allan B. Okey, Joshua W. Hamilton, Stephen E. Bloom, & C.F. Wilkinson. (1986). Ah receptor for 2,3,7,8‐ tetrachlorodibenzo‐p‐Dioxin: Ontogeny in chick embryo liver. Journal of Biochemical Toxicology. 1(3). 39–49. 37 indexed citations
20.
Peakall, David B., et al.. (1972). Embryonic Mortality and Chromosomal Alterations Caused by Aroclor 1254 in Ring Doves. Environmental Health Perspectives. 1. 103–104. 46 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026