Thomas Roemer

781 citations
12 papers · 564 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Roemer

12 papers receiving 517 citations

Peers

Thomas Roemer
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 267
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 295
  • Management Information Systems 147
  • Management Science and Operations Research 107
  • Strategy and Management 87
Replace R. I. M. Young with:
R. I. M. Young United Kingdom
P.T. Kidd United Kingdom
Peter Sáckett United Kingdom
Michel Aldanondo France
Anselmi Immonen
Antti Sääksvuori
Alessandro Pozzetti Italy
Miryam Barad Israel
Guenther Schuh Germany
Taeho Park United States
Thomas Roemer relative to R. I. M. Young United Kingdom R. I. M. Young's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
R. I. M. Young · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Roemer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Roemer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Roemer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Roemer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Roemer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Roemer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Roemer. The network helps show where Thomas Roemer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Roemer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Roemer Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Roemer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2000119
2 200799
3 200492
4 200172
5 200555
6 200647
7 200440
8 200919
9 20058
10
The Complexity of Scheduling Customer Orders
20018
11 20044
12
Models for Concurrent Product and Process Design
20091

About Thomas Roemer

Thomas Roemer is a scholar working on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Management of Technology and Innovation, Mechanical Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications and Social Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 564 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Product Development and Customization (6 papers), Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms (5 papers), Design Education and Practice (3 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (3 papers), Optimization and Packing Problems (2 papers), Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis (2 papers), Optimization and Search Problems (2 papers) and Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (267 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (295 citations), Management Information Systems (147 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (107 citations) and Strategy and Management (87 citations). Thomas Roemer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Reza Ahmadi, Stephen C. Graves, Uttarayan Bagchi, Ali Yassine, Matthias Holweg, Ki-Chan Kim and Reza Ahmadi. Their work appears in journals such as Operations Research, European Journal of Operational Research, Management Science, Naval Research Logistics (NRL) and Production Planning & Control.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact