Thomas Pink

1.2k total citations
33 papers, 196 citations indexed

About

Thomas Pink is a scholar working on Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Pink has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 196 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Philosophy, 11 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Thomas Pink's work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (8 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (7 papers) and Free Will and Agency (5 papers). Thomas Pink is often cited by papers focused on Political Philosophy and Ethics (8 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (7 papers) and Free Will and Agency (5 papers). Thomas Pink collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Thomas Pink's co-authors include Avishai Margalit, Roger Teichmann, Joseph Raz, Michael Thompson, Gavin P. Lawrence, David S. Oderberg, Sabina Lovibond, Roger Crisp, Onora O’Neill and Anthony O’Hear and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Mind and Philosophical Perspectives.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Pink

24 papers receiving 168 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas Pink United Kingdom 7 117 98 43 26 18 33 196
Peter A. Graham United States 6 163 1.4× 168 1.7× 25 0.6× 21 0.8× 28 1.6× 9 216
David Cummiskey United States 6 94 0.8× 69 0.7× 57 1.3× 9 0.3× 17 0.9× 15 141
Folke Tersman Sweden 6 119 1.0× 103 1.1× 53 1.2× 14 0.5× 37 2.1× 24 191
Michael Gorr United States 7 172 1.5× 155 1.6× 57 1.3× 29 1.1× 46 2.6× 22 263
Philip Stratton‐Lake United Kingdom 7 199 1.7× 148 1.5× 40 0.9× 38 1.5× 16 0.9× 27 251
Andrew Sepielli Canada 8 120 1.0× 83 0.8× 18 0.4× 18 0.7× 7 0.4× 14 162
Sergio Tenenbaum Canada 10 266 2.3× 192 2.0× 44 1.0× 69 2.7× 21 1.2× 30 337
Katia Vavova United States 5 141 1.2× 100 1.0× 27 0.6× 26 1.0× 40 2.2× 8 166
Jussi Suikkanen United Kingdom 8 119 1.0× 90 0.9× 34 0.8× 29 1.1× 9 0.5× 32 164
David P. Schweikard Germany 4 60 0.5× 52 0.5× 35 0.8× 26 1.0× 49 2.7× 11 147

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Pink

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Pink's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Pink with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Pink more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Pink

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Pink. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Pink. The network helps show where Thomas Pink may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Pink

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Pink. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Pink based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Pink. Thomas Pink is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pink, Thomas. (2021). Goodness and motivation. Philosophical Explorations. 24(1). 5–20.
2.
Pink, Thomas. (2019). Freedom, Power and Causation. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 26(1). 1 indexed citations
3.
Pink, Thomas. (2018). Suárez on Authority as Coercitive Teacher. Quaestio. 18. 451–486.
4.
Pink, Thomas. (2017). Dignitatis Humanae: continuity after Leo XIII.
5.
Pink, Thomas. (2017). The Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Jurisprudence.
6.
Pink, Thomas. (2016). Suarez and Bellarmine on the Church as a Coercive Lawgiver. 1 indexed citations
7.
Pink, Thomas. (2015). Francisco Suarez Selections from Three Works. Research Portal (King's College London). 1 indexed citations
8.
Pink, Thomas, et al.. (2014). Selections from three works. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University). 14 indexed citations
9.
Pink, Thomas. (2014). Law and the Normativity of Obligation. Jurisprudence. 5(1). 1–28. 2 indexed citations
10.
Pink, Thomas. (2013). The Interpretation of Dignitatis Humanae: A Reply to Martin Rhomheimer. 11(1). 1 indexed citations
11.
Pink, Thomas. (2013). The interpretation of Dignitatis Humanae. Research Portal (King's College London). 11(1). 1 indexed citations
12.
Pink, Thomas. (2013). Hobbes on Liberty, Action, and Free Will. Oxford University Press eBooks.
13.
Pink, Thomas. (2012). Conscience and coercion. Research Portal (King's College London). 2012(225). 1 indexed citations
14.
Pink, Thomas. (2012). Reason and Obligation in Suárez. Oxford University Press eBooks. 175–208. 1 indexed citations
15.
Pink, Thomas. (2011). Thomas Hobbes and the Ethics of Freedom. Inquiry. 54(5). 541–563. 10 indexed citations
16.
Pink, Thomas. (2008). Psychology and Philosophy: Inquiries into the Soul from Late Scholasticism to Contemporary Thought. Springer US. 2 indexed citations
17.
Pink, Thomas. (2007). Normativity and Reason. Journal of Moral Philosophy. 4(3). 406–431. 2 indexed citations
18.
Pink, Thomas. (2004). Free Will: A Very Short Introduction. Research Portal (King's College London). 41 indexed citations
19.
Pink, Thomas. (2003). 3.4. Action and Self-Determination. Intellectica Revue de l Association pour la Recherche Cognitive. 36(1). 247–259. 5 indexed citations
20.
Pink, Thomas. (1996). The Psychology of Freedom. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 28 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026