Roger Crisp
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Christopher J. CowtonTony HopeK. W. M. FulfordJulian SavulescuAndrew MooreBrad HookerJames GriffinNicholas Hicks
- Topics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory (23 papers)Ethics in medical practice (22 papers)Political Philosophy and Ethics (17 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Roger Crisp
83 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
- Philosophy 602
- Cognitive Neuroscience 510
- Political Science and International Relations 369
- General Health Professions 343
- Sociology and Political Science 264
Countries citing papers authored by Roger Crisp
This map shows the geographic impact of Roger Crisp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roger Crisp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roger Crisp more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Roger Crisp
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roger Crisp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roger Crisp. The network helps show where Roger Crisp may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roger Crisp
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roger Crisp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roger Crisp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Roger Crisp. Roger Crisp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | Hume: sobre virtud, utilidad y moralidad | 1 |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | Well-Being and Morality: Essays in Honour of James Griffin | 32 |
| 11 | Business ethics: perspectives on the practice of theory | 15 |
| 12 | 40 | |
| 13 | 34 | |
| 14 | 45 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 26 | |
| 17 | First among unequals | 0 |
| 18 | Hypocrisy and Moral Seriousness | 45 |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | Ideal utilitarianism : theory and practice | 2 |
About Roger Crisp
Roger Crisp is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 91 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (23 papers), Ethics in medical practice (22 papers) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (602 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (510 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (369 citations). Roger Crisp has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Christopher J. Cowton, Tony Hope, K. W. M. Fulford, Julian Savulescu, Andrew Moore, Brad Hooker, James Griffin, Nicholas Hicks, David J. Reynolds and Siân Griffiths. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, The Philosophical Review and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.