Alex Neill
- Philosophy top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Social Psychology
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 5%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Co-authors
- Aaron RidleyMurray SmithGarry L. HagbergNoël CarrollChristopher JanawaySusan L. FeaginRosemary HipkinsLindsey Conner
- Topics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers)Visual Culture and Art Theory (3 papers)Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (2 papers)
- Journals
- Philosophy and Phenomenological ResearchJournal of Aesthetics and Art CriticismPhilosophical Studies
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Alex Neill
19 papers receiving 113 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Philosophy 64
- Cognitive Neuroscience 45
- Social Psychology 34
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 29
- Literature and Literary Theory 26
Countries citing papers authored by Alex Neill
This map shows the geographic impact of Alex Neill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alex Neill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alex Neill more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alex Neill
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alex Neill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alex Neill. The network helps show where Alex Neill may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alex Neill
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alex Neill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alex Neill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alex Neill. Alex Neill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Shifting balances 2: The impact of the NCEA implementation on the teaching of geography and home economics | 1 |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | The philosophy of art : readings ancient and modern | 11 |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | Film and Phenomenology | 0 |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | The Philosophy of Art | 4 |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 17 | |
| 20 | 11 |
About Alex Neill
Alex Neill is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, General Arts and Humanities and Philosophy, having authored 24 papers that have together received 173 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (3 papers) and Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (29 citations), Philosophy (64 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (26 citations). Alex Neill has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Aaron Ridley, Murray Smith, Garry L. Hagberg, Noël Carroll, Christopher Janaway, Susan L. Feagin, Rosemary Hipkins and Lindsey Conner. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism and Philosophical Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.