Thomas Pak
Impact in
- Developmental Neuroscience top 2%
- Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
-
- Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Papers in
-
- Migration, Health and Trauma 2
- Co-authors
- Seth Blackshaw (3 shared papers)Ana L. Miranda‐Angulo (2 shared papers)Daniel A. Lee (2 shared papers)Susan Aja (2 shared papers)Hong Wang (1 shared paper)Juan Song (1 shared paper)Gord Fishell (1 shared paper)Joseph L. Bedont (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- iScience (1 paper)Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (1 paper)PLoS Genetics (1 paper)Frontiers in Neuroscience (1 paper)Nature Neuroscience (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesColombiaVietnam
In The Last Decade
Thomas Pak
9 papers receiving 599 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Developmental Neuroscience 238
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 231
- Neurology 57
- Behavioral Neuroscience 21
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 97
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Pak
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Pak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Pak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Pak more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Pak
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Pak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Pak. The network helps show where Thomas Pak may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Pak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 377 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 71 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 70 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 50 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 27 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 0 |
About Thomas Pak
Thomas Pak is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Developmental Neuroscience and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 12 papers that have together received 606 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers), Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases (2 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (2 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (2 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (2 papers), Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (2 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (1 paper) and Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (238 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (231 citations), Neurology (57 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (21 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (97 citations). Thomas Pak has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Colombia and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include Seth Blackshaw, Ana L. Miranda‐Angulo, Daniel A. Lee, Susan Aja, Hong Wang, Juan Song, Gord Fishell, Joseph L. Bedont, Hirohide Takebayashi and Vanessa Charubhumi. Their work appears in journals such as iScience, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, PLoS Genetics, Frontiers in Neuroscience and Nature Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.