Thomas P. Chacko

682 total citations · 1 hit paper
6 papers, 485 citations indexed

About

Thomas P. Chacko is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Research and Theory. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas P. Chacko has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 485 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in General Health Professions, 2 papers in Clinical Psychology and 2 papers in Research and Theory. Recurrent topics in Thomas P. Chacko's work include Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers), Nursing education and management (2 papers) and Stress Responses and Cortisol (1 paper). Thomas P. Chacko is often cited by papers focused on Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers), Nursing education and management (2 papers) and Stress Responses and Cortisol (1 paper). Thomas P. Chacko collaborates with scholars based in United States. Thomas P. Chacko's co-authors include Kristin Naragon‐Gainey, Tierney P. McMahon, Christine Kovner, Carol S. Brewer, Maja Djukic, William H. Greene, Yulin Yang, Farida Fatehi, Craig R. Colder and Ying‐Yu Chao and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Bulletin, Frontiers in Psychology and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

In The Last Decade

Thomas P. Chacko

6 papers receiving 468 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

The structure of common emotion regulation strategies: A meta-analytic examination.

2017 387 citations Kristin Naragon‐Gainey, Tierney P. McMahon et al. Psychological Bulletin profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas P. Chacko United States	4	293	175	125	69	52	6	485
Jasna Hudek‐Knežević Croatia	15	339 1.2×	142 0.8×	174 1.4×	129 1.9×	47 0.9×	51	559
Evan Zahniser United States	9	248 0.8×	79 0.5×	152 1.2×	116 1.7×	72 1.4×	12	429
Júlia Halamová Slovakia	13	356 1.2×	169 1.0×	110 0.9×	96 1.4×	57 1.1×	66	500
Divya Madhusudhan United States	4	303 1.0×	100 0.6×	91 0.7×	118 1.7×	13 0.3×	13	420
Ida Solhaug Norway	8	575 2.0×	172 1.0×	205 1.6×	240 3.5×	60 1.2×	10	729
Saulo Sirigatti Italy	11	290 1.0×	129 0.7×	299 2.4×	113 1.6×	104 2.0×	30	611
Christine A. Hovanitz United States	12	322 1.1×	76 0.4×	116 0.9×	110 1.6×	57 1.1×	21	549
Javier Prado-Abril Spain	10	198 0.7×	87 0.5×	121 1.0×	133 1.9×	40 0.8×	31	375
Julie Pironom France	7	209 0.7×	36 0.2×	129 1.0×	163 2.4×	33 0.6×	21	436

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas P. Chacko

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas P. Chacko's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas P. Chacko with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas P. Chacko more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas P. Chacko

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas P. Chacko. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas P. Chacko. The network helps show where Thomas P. Chacko may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas P. Chacko

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas P. Chacko. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas P. Chacko based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas P. Chacko. Thomas P. Chacko is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Chacko, Thomas P., Matthew Morris, Robert D. Forsten, et al.. (2023). A regulatory pathway model of neuropsychological disruption in Havana syndrome. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 14. 1180929–1180929. 1 indexed citations

2.

Chacko, Thomas P., et al.. (2022). Mapping the network biology of metabolic response to stress in posttraumatic stress disorder and obesity. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. 941019–941019. 2 indexed citations

3.

Anderson, Laura M. & Thomas P. Chacko. (2018). Bariatric Outcomes: Self-Management for Sustained Surgical Success. Journal of Addictions Nursing. 29(1). 32–42. 4 indexed citations

4.

Naragon‐Gainey, Kristin, Tierney P. McMahon, & Thomas P. Chacko. (2017). The structure of common emotion regulation strategies: A meta-analytic examination.. Psychological Bulletin. 143(4). 384–427. 387 indexed citations breakdown →

5.

Brewer, Carol S., Christine Kovner, Maja Djukic, et al.. (2016). Impact of transformational leadership on nurse work outcomes. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 72(11). 2879–2893. 58 indexed citations

6.

Brewer, Carol S., Ying‐Yu Chao, Craig R. Colder, Christine Kovner, & Thomas P. Chacko. (2015). A structural equation model of turnover for a longitudinal survey among early career registered nurses. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 52(11). 1735–1745. 33 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact